Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;101(2):333–350. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.09.006

Table 2.

Prognostic scoring systems in myelodysplastic syndrome.

System Risk factors evaluated Validated application
IPSS (IWG-PM)
Blood. 1997;89: 2079.
  • 4 risk groups

  • Factors: blasts, cytogenetics, and number of cytopenias

  • At diagnosis

  • Patients not on therapy

  • de novo MDS (not to be used for therapy-related or secondary MDS or CMML)

  • Lower risk group is highly variable

WPSS (WHO)
J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7594.
  • 5 risk groups

  • Factors: WHO category, cytogenetics, and red cell transfusion dependence ≥q8weeks for ≥4 months

  • Applied at any time

  • Patients not on therapy

  • de novo MDS (not to be used for therapy-related or secondary MDS or CMML)

MDACC (MD Anderson)
Cancer. 2008;113:1351.
  • 4 risk groups

  • Factors: cytogenetics, performance status, age, hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood count, marrow blasts, prior transfusion

  • At diagnosis only

  • Patients not on therapy

  • de novo MDS, therapy-related and secondary MDS, and CMML

  • Delineation of the low to intermediate-1 IPSS groups better

IPSS-R (IWG-PM)
Blood. 2012;120:2454.
  • 5 risk groups

  • In addition to IPSS risk factors, increased delineation of the cytogeneWc subgroups†

  • At diagnosis

  • Patients not on therapy

  • de novo MDS (not to be used for therapy-related or secondary MDS or CMML)

  • Lower risk group is highly variable

Cytogene:c subgroups:
  • Very good: -Y, del(11q).
  • Good: Normal, del(5q), del(12p), del(20q), double including del(5q).
  • Intermediate: del(7q), +8, +19, i(17q), any other single or double independent clones.
  • Poor: -7, inv(3)/t(3q)/del(3q), double including -7/del(7q), complex: 3 abnormalities.
  • Very poor: Complex: >3 abnormalities.