Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;12:897–905. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S129974

Table 4.

Comparison of IOS parameters between the healthy control and COPD groups

Healthy controls COPD COPD 1 COPD 2 COPD 3 COPD 4
Z5 (%predicted) 89.24±29.98 159.50 (111.30 to 225)a 114.32±54.47 150.22±78.02a 195.57±80.87a,b 266.3±138.33ac
Fres (L/s) 12.62±3.84 23.23±7.60a 16.9±6.52 21.48±5.71a 25.46±6.11a,b 27.71±9.32ac
X5 (kPa/L/s) −0.09±0.05 −0.25 (−0.41 to −0.14)a −0.17±0.12 −0.23±0.18a −0.33±0.2a,b −0.49±0.26ac
R5 (%predicted) 86.56±28.39 140.50 (106.55 to 185.7)a 105.25±44.79 134.52±61.75a 165.54±64.12a,b 214.64±109.68ac
R20 (%predicted) 82±24.65 97.92±33.42a 84.48±25.25 96.55±31.44a 100.26±38.42a,b 106.61±32.9a,b
R5–R20 (%predicted) 115.96±103.54 458.23 (241.95 to 663.40)a 248.8±258.35 382.9±312.48a 606.22±295.68a,b 920.03±664.1ac

Notes: Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and median (IQR).

a

P<0.05 compared with the healthy controls.

b

P<0.05 compared with COPD 1.

c

P<0.05 compared with COPD 2.

Abbreviations: IOS, impulse oscillometry; Z5, respiratory impedance; Fres, resonant frequency; X5, respiratory reactance; R5–R20, respiratory resistance; IQR, inter-quartile range.