Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;145(1):122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.008

Table 6.

Multivariable analysis of factors associated with the choice between RRSO and OCS, including quality of life and cancer worry data (N=1109)

Variables Odds Ratio* 95% CI P-value

Self-Reported Mutation Status: <.0001
 Not Tested vs Positive 0.268 0.170 0.421
 Tested but Results Unknown vs Positive 0.638 0.301 1.354
 Negative vs Positive 0.181 0.096 0.343

Previous Cancer History (Any) 1.723 1.166 2.547 0.0063

Anesthesia was risky 1.981 1.444 2.716 <.0001

I might have had lots of pain after surgery 1.612 1.169 2.223 0.0036

I would have been upset because I could no longer have more children 0.564 0.387 0.823 0.0030

I might have had significant problems from early menopause 0.594 0.451 0.782 0.0002

I will be worried every time I go in for another exam 2.203 1.590 3.052 <.0001

Screening is less invasive, less radical than surgery 0.139 0.107 0.182 <.0001

Risk of ovarian cancer certainty 1.977 1.352 2.890 0.0004

Risk of ovarian cancer frequency of worry 1.977 1.282 3.049 0.0021
*

An OR>1 indicates that the variable is associated with choosing RRSO over OCS, while an OR<1 indicates that the variable is associated with choosing OCS over RRSO