Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 12;94(1):115–124. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0108-z

Table 4.

Distal outcomes across four latent classes of alcohol and marijuana use in adjusted analyses: overall model statistics and pairwise comparisons

Proportion Standard error Significant pairwise comparisons
Past month frequency of sex without a condom, χ 2 = 16.815, p = 0.0008
 High dual use 1.11 0.15
 Moderate alcohol/increasing marijuana 1.24 0.14 Increasing marijuana vs. non-use, p < .001
 Moderate alcohol 1.16 0.10 Moderate alcohol vs. non-use, p = .007
 Non-use 0.81 0.06
Multiple sexual partners, χ 2 = 18.388, p = 0.0004
 High dual use 0.39 0.06 Dual vs. non-use, p = .001
 Moderate alcohol/increasing marijuana 0.46 0.06 Increasing marijuana vs. non-use, p < .001
Increasing marijuana vs. moderate alcohol, p = .070
 Moderate alcohol 0.29 0.04 Moderate alcohol vs. non-use, p = .061
 Non-use 0.20 0.03
Sexually transmitted infection, χ 2 = 20.267, p = 0.0001
 High dual use 0.30 0.06 Dual use vs. non-use, p < .001
 Moderate alcohol/increasing marijuana 0.24 0.05 Increasing marijuana vs. non-use, p = .002
 Moderate alcohol 0.22 0.03 Moderate alcohol vs. non-use, p = .002
 Non-use 0.11 0.02
Teenage pregnancy, χ 2 = 35.153 p = 0.0001
 High dual use 0.71 0.06 Dual use vs. non-use, p < .001
Dual use vs. moderate alcohol, p = .011
 Moderate alcohol/increasing marijuana 0.55 0.06 Increasing marijuana vs. non-use, p < .001
 Moderate alcohol 0.53 0.04 Moderate alcohol vs. non-use, p = .002
 Non-use 0.36 0.03

Note: Models adjust for gender, intervention status, free/reduced price lunch, as well as academic performance, aggressive/disruptive behavior, attention/concentration problems, shy behavior, impulsivity, hyperactivity, and likeability/rejection as rated by first grade teachers