Table 1.
Recreational resource tertilea | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Girls | Boys | |||||||
Total (N = 47,856), % | Low (N = 21,043), % | Medium (N = 15,309), % | High (N = 11,504), % | Total (N = 47,141), % | Low (N = 20,466), % | Medium (N = 15,337), % | High (N = 11,338), % | |
Study population | 50.4 | 44 | 32 | 24 | 49.6 | 43.4 | 32.5 | 24.1 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||||||
Non-Hispanic white | 17.9 | 20.3 | 17 | 14.7 | 19.1 | 21.7 | 18.5 | 15.5 |
Non-Hispanic black | 26.8 | 20.4 | 32.4 | 31.2 | 24.6 | 19.2 | 28.4 | 29.3 |
Hispanic | 36.9 | 35.3 | 34.8 | 42.7 | 37.1 | 34.7 | 36.1 | 42.8 |
Asian/Pacific Islander | 18.1 | 23.7 | 15.5 | 11.2 | 18.9 | 24.2 | 16.8 | 12.1 |
Other | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Student household povertyb | ||||||||
High | 65.8 | 63.3 | 67.7 | 67.5 | 65 | 62.3 | 67 | 67.1 |
Low | 34.2 | 36.7 | 32.3 | 32.5 | 35 | 38.7 | 33 | 32.9 |
aEmpirical percentiles were calculated separately for the density of parks, playgrounds, and sports facilities for all schools in NYC. These percentiles were summed, and a new composite percentile was created, representing the overall relative school rank. Tertiles were created based on the distribution of school composite percentiles
bParticipation in the National School Lunch Program acts as a proxy for household poverty. Students are considered “high poverty” if they are eligible for reduced-price/free meals, meaning their household income is within federally defined poverty limits [34]. Students are considered “low poverty” if they are not known to be eligible