Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 23;94(1):20–29. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0114-1

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of New York City public school students enrolled in grade 6–8 between 2006 and 2011 in the study sample, stratified by a level of recreational resources in the school neighborhood

Recreational resource tertilea
Girls Boys
Total (N = 47,856), % Low (N = 21,043), % Medium (N = 15,309), % High (N = 11,504), % Total (N = 47,141), % Low (N = 20,466), % Medium (N = 15,337), % High (N = 11,338), %
Study population 50.4 44 32 24 49.6 43.4 32.5 24.1
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white 17.9 20.3 17 14.7 19.1 21.7 18.5 15.5
 Non-Hispanic black 26.8 20.4 32.4 31.2 24.6 19.2 28.4 29.3
 Hispanic 36.9 35.3 34.8 42.7 37.1 34.7 36.1 42.8
 Asian/Pacific Islander 18.1 23.7 15.5 11.2 18.9 24.2 16.8 12.1
 Other 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4
Student household povertyb
 High 65.8 63.3 67.7 67.5 65 62.3 67 67.1
 Low 34.2 36.7 32.3 32.5 35 38.7 33 32.9

aEmpirical percentiles were calculated separately for the density of parks, playgrounds, and sports facilities for all schools in NYC. These percentiles were summed, and a new composite percentile was created, representing the overall relative school rank. Tertiles were created based on the distribution of school composite percentiles

bParticipation in the National School Lunch Program acts as a proxy for household poverty. Students are considered “high poverty” if they are eligible for reduced-price/free meals, meaning their household income is within federally defined poverty limits [34]. Students are considered “low poverty” if they are not known to be eligible