Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Aug 11;73:244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.08.010

Table 2.

Model results of daily positive emotion growth, LKT vs. MT.

Predictor Fixed effects, b [95% Confidence Interval ]

OXTR rs2254298a OXTR rs53576b OXTR rs1042778c CD38 rs6449182d CD38 rs3796863e
Intercept 1.500* [1.281, 1.719] 1.568* [1.317, 1.818] 1.406* [1.178, 1.633] *1.476 [1.168, 1.784] *1.638 [1.365, 1.911]
Week .006 [−.026, .038] −.014 [−.052, .022] .024 [−.009, .056] .010 [−.035, .055] .016 [−.023, .056]
LKT .277 [−.027, .580] .169 [−.175, .512] .337 [.031, .643] .175 [−.266, .616] .119 [−.290, .528]
Genotype −.032 [−.396, .333] −.154 [−.506, .198] .202 [−.153, .557] .018 [−.360, .394] −.253 [−.608, .102]
Week × LKT .025 [−.019, .070] .048 [−.003, .098] .004 [−.039, .048] .010 [−.053, .074] .002 [−.057, .061]
Week × Genotype −.018 [−.071, .035] .026 [−.025, .078] −.059 [−.109, −.008] −.015 [−.070, .040] −.029 [−.080, .023]
LKT × Genotype −.252 [−.777, .272] .047 [−.451, .546] −.392 [−.918, .135] .036 [−.498, .571] .152 [−.362, .666]
Week × Genotype × LKT .053 [−.023, .130] −.006 [−.078, .066] .108* [.034, .183] .048 [−.030, .125] .065 [−.010, .139]

Random Effects

Level 1
VAR(L1 Residual) .204 .204 .203 .203 .203
Spatial Power .000 .000 −.000 −.000 −.000
Level 2
VAR(Intercept) .435 .439 .436 .445 .436
VAR(Week) .005 .005 .005 .005 .005
COR(Intercept/Week) −.010 −.015 .018 −.045 −.050

Model Information

Parameters 13 13 13 13 13
Deviance 4968.1 4970.0 4963.0 4970.3 4966.7

Note:

*

p < .05 after Bonferroni correction. LKT = loving-kindness training. MT = mindfulness training. L1 = Level-1. VAR = variance. COR = correlation.

a

Vantage/Non-vantage = A-carriers/GG

b

Vantage/Non-vantage = GG/A-carriers.

c

Vantage/Non-vantage = GG/T-carriers.

d

Vantage/Non-vantage = CC/G-carriers.

e

Vantage/Non-vantage = A-carriers/CC.