Table 2.
Reference | Research period | Research location | Regional location | Diagnosis technique | Participant or patient (n) | Apparent prevalence (%) [95% CI]a |
Prior information | True prevalence (%) [95% CrI]b |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referred diagnosis technique | Sensitivity (%) [95% CI] |
Specificity (%) [95% CI] |
||||||||
Verle et al. [71] | 1999 | Hoa Binh | North | Biopsy of subcutaneous nodules | 2522 | 1c | na | |||
NIMPE [33] | 2000–2011 | NIMPE | National | na | 2,687d | na | na | |||
Taylor et al. [73] | 2007–2008 | National hospital | North | Cranial radiology | 352 | 0.3 | na | |||
Anh Tuan et al. [49] | 1992–2000 | Ho Chi Minh hospitals | South | Antibody-ELISA | 3814 | 4.30 [3.70–4.99] | Antibody-ELISAe | 65.0 | 63.0 | 0.89 [0.16–2.53] |
Erhart et al. [48] | 1999 | Bac Ninh | North | Antigen-ELISA | 210 | 5.71 [3.29–9.72] | 3.99 [1.24–8.27] | |||
Doanh et al. [47] | 1999–2000 | Bac Ninh | North | Antigen-ELISA | 597 | 5.02 [3.54–7.08] | 2.90 [0.78–5.95] | |||
Somers et al. [25] | 2003–2004 | Bac Kan, Hai Duong, Ha Tinh | North | Antigen-ELISA | 707 | 2.40 [1.50–3.81] | 0.86 [0.10–2.67] | |||
Huong [35] | 2005 | Ha Giang | North | Antigen-ELISA | 97 | 13.40 [0.80–21.58] | Antigen-ELISAf | 87.0 [62–98] | 95.0 [90–99] | 13.27 [11.08–15.76] |
Trung et al. [74] | 2007–2010 | Bac Giang, Bac Ninh, Dien Bien, Ha Giang, Lai Chau, Lang Son, Tuyen Quang | North | Antigen-ELISA | 758g | 6.00 [5.00–8.00] | 3.74 [1.26–7.22] |
Abbreviation: na not applicable
aConfidence interval
bCredible interval
cCase of cysticercosis
dNumbers of patients
eSensitivity and specificity of Antibody-ELISA based on Diaz et al. [65]
fSensitivity and specificity of Antigen-ELISA based on Coral-Almeida et al. [69]
gParticipants have chronic headache and epilepsy