Table 3.
Varus deformity measured in ° | Valgus deformity measured in ° | Flexion deformity measured in ° | Extension deformity measured in ° | Depression AP mm | Depression lateral mm | Condylar widening mm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proximal | |||||||
Patient ID | |||||||
2 | 5 | 3 | |||||
11 | 10 | 2 | 3 | ||||
3 | 8 | 1 | 1 | ||||
17 | 6 | 3 | 10 | ||||
34 | 6 | 2 | 8 | ||||
39 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | |||
46 | 4 | ||||||
52 | 3 | 4 | |||||
55 | 4 | 1 |
Varus deformity measured in ° | Valgus deformity measured in ° | Flexion deformity measured in ° | Extension deformity measured in ° | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shaft | ||||
Patient ID | ||||
8 | 4 | |||
13 | 5 |
Varus deformity measured in ° | Valgus deformity measured in ° | Flexion deformity measured in ° | Extension deformity measured in ° | Central depression > 3 mm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Distal | |||||
Patient ID | |||||
5 | 3 | ||||
25 | 3 | ||||
26 | 4 | ||||
33 | 3 | ||||
45 | 8 | ||||
51 | 7 | ||||
53 | 5 |
Eight weeks after frame removal, the radiological assessments were made on AP and side X-rays. Proximal tibial fractures were evaluated concerning alignment and depression of the articular surface and condylar widening as described by Rasmussen et al. [22]. Shaft fractures were evaluated concerning alignment. Distal fractures were evaluated with regard to alignment, talar subluxation, central depression and mortise widening as described by Ramos et al. [2] Furthermore, an assessment of the postoperative reduction for distal fractures was performed as described by March and co-workers [23], modified by Burwell & Charnley [24]