Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 10;12(1):35–44. doi: 10.1007/s11751-017-0275-9

Table 3.

Observed deformities, depressions and condylar widening

Varus deformity measured in ° Valgus deformity measured in ° Flexion deformity measured in ° Extension deformity measured in ° Depression AP mm Depression lateral mm Condylar widening mm
Proximal
 Patient ID
  2 5 3
  11 10 2 3
  3 8 1 1
  17 6 3 10
  34 6 2 8
  39 3 5 3 0
  46 4
  52 3 4
  55 4 1
Varus deformity measured in ° Valgus deformity measured in ° Flexion deformity measured in ° Extension deformity measured in °
Shaft
 Patient ID
  8 4
 13 5
Varus deformity measured in ° Valgus deformity measured in ° Flexion deformity measured in ° Extension deformity measured in ° Central depression > 3 mm
Distal
 Patient ID
  5 3
  25 3
  26 4
  33 3
  45 8
  51 7
  53 5

Eight weeks after frame removal, the radiological assessments were made on AP and side X-rays. Proximal tibial fractures were evaluated concerning alignment and depression of the articular surface and condylar widening as described by Rasmussen et al. [22]. Shaft fractures were evaluated concerning alignment. Distal fractures were evaluated with regard to alignment, talar subluxation, central depression and mortise widening as described by Ramos et al. [2] Furthermore, an assessment of the postoperative reduction for distal fractures was performed as described by March and co-workers [23], modified by Burwell & Charnley [24]