Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 8;2017:4146391. doi: 10.1155/2017/4146391

Table 2.

Overall clinical skin improvement evaluation by two separate investigators.

Improvement Investigator A 
N (%)
Investigator B 
N (%)
Worse 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
No change 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Improved 3 (27%) 0 (0%)
Much improved 8 (73%) 10 (91%)
Very much improved 0 (0%) 1 (9%)

The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was used for skin improvement evaluation. Worse (0), no change (1), improved (2), much improved (3), and very much improved (4). N = number of patients.