Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 22;29(3):498–504. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.498

Table 1. Peak angles and angular velocities of lower extremity, and ratios of each variable in the post-trials to those in the pre-trials.

Fatigue group (N=17) Control group (N=17)


Pre-trialb
Post-trial b
The ratio (%) a Pre-trialb
Post-trial b
The ratio (%) a
Hip flexion
Peak angle 41.1 ± 12.6 41.8 ± 9.3
41.2 ± 13.3 100.1 ± 6.7 40.6 ± 10.3 96.6 ± 8.6
Peak angular velocity 216.7 ± 44.6 238.9 ± 51.8
231.6 ± 42.5 107.8 ± 9.7 * 238.4 ± 56.1 99.6 ± 9.2
Knee flexion
Peak angle 60.8 ± 8.2 60.0 ± 9.9
60.6 ± 8.1 99.8 ± 4.9 60.1 ± 8.7 100.7 ± 6.2
Peak angular velocity 419.2 ± 53.4 450.6 ± 57.6
443.5 ± 52.4 106.2 ± 7.3 * 452.2 ± 49.9 100.8 ± 6.6
Ankle dorsiflexion
Peak angle 30.1 ± 6.9 29.2 ± 4.9
30.5 ± 7.2 101.2 ± 5.9 31.0 ± 4.7 107.0 ± 13.5
Peak angular velocity 674.6 ± 22.3 715.3 ± 42.0
655.8 ± 88.8 98.0 ± 7.6 692.0 ± 142.2 97.2 ± 9.8

aThe ratios (%) of each kinematic variable in the post-trials to those in the pre-trials were presented alongside. bAngles and angular velocities of hip, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion are shown in each (deg) and (deg/s). *Significant difference between the ratios of fatigue and control groups (p<0.05).