Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 8;96(3):664–673. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0671

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis of prevalence using CCA trace negative and CCA trace positive, respectively, with subzones analyzed as fixed effects

All CCA mapping schools CCA trace negative CCA trace positive
Analysis by subzone 17,172 pupils; 344 schools 17,172 pupils; 344 schools
R2marginal= 0.107/R2conditional = 0.389 R2marginal = 0.062/R2conditional = 0.256
Parameter Adjusted odds ratio Parameter Adjusted odds ratio
Fixed effects Category (SE) (95% CI) P (SE) (95% CI) P
(Intercept) −3.81 (0.24) 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) < 0.001 −0.8 (0.16) 0.45 (0.33, 0.61) < 0.001
Zone Plateau
E-high 1.33 (0.56) 3.79 (1.26, 11.39) 0.018 0.71 (0.4) 2.02 (0.92, 4.43) 0.078
E-low 0.5 (0.41) 1.64 (0.74, 3.68) 0.226 0.35 (0.28) 1.42 (0.82, 2.45) 0.211
NE-high −0.43 (0.82) 0.65 (0.13, 3.24) 0.601 −0.79 (0.53) 0.45 (0.16, 1.28) 0.137
NE-low 1.05 (0.32) 2.86 (1.54, 5.31) 0.001 0.66 (0.22) 1.94 (1.27, 2.96) 0.002
NW-high 1.79 (0.27) 5.98 (3.49, 10.24) < 0.001 0.86 (0.19) 2.37 (1.64, 3.41) < 0.001
NW-low 0.79 (0.38) 2.2 (1.04, 4.66) 0.039 0.33 (0.26) 1.39 (0.83, 2.32) 0.213
SW-high 1.6 (0.28) 4.96 (2.86, 8.61) < 0.001 0.42 (0.19) 1.53 (1.05, 2.22) 0.027
SW-low −0.15 (0.38) 0.86 (0.41, 1.79) 0.688 −0.99 (0.25) 0.37 (0.23, 0.61) < 0.001
Age −0.04 (0.03) 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) 0.213 −0.02 (0.021) 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 0.267
Age2 −0.04 (0.02) 0.96 (0.92, 1) 0.03 −0.05 (0.014) 0.96 (0.93, 0.98) 0.001
Sex F
M 0.48 (0.05) 1.62 (1.47, 1.79) < 0.001 0.16 (0.034) 1.17 (1.1, 1.25) < 0.001
Random effects Variance SD Variance SD
School (intercept) 1.52 1.23 0.86 0.93

CCA = circulating cathodic antigen point-of-care urine cassette assay; CI = confidence interval; E = east; F = female; M = male; NE = northeast; NW = northwest; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error of the mean; SW = southwest.