Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 22;17:85. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0834-8

Table 2.

Incidence rate ratios (IRR) of T2DM in relation to calendar year and demographic factors

Characteristic Boys Girls All
IRR (95% CIs) P-value IRR (95% CIs) P-value IRR (95% CIs) P-value
Year
 2007 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 2008 1.41 (0.62, 3.16) 0.411 1.12 (0.49, 2.53) 0.792 1.25 (0.71, 2.23) 0.440
 2009 1.59 (0.72, 3.50) 0.250 2.04 (0.99, 4.21) 0.053 1.82 (1.07, 3.10) 0.027
 2010 3.01 (1.48, 6.15) 0.002 3.12 (1.58, 6.15) 0.001 3.06 (1.87, 5.01) <0.001
 2011 2.94 (1.44, 5.99) 0.003 3.17 (1.61, 6.23) 0.001 3.05 (1.86, 4.98) <0.001
 2012 4.03 (2.02, 8.02) <0.001 2.51 (1.25, 5.05) 0.001 3.25 (2.00, 5.28) <0.001
 2013 6.23 (3.20, 12.12) <0.001 3.66 (1.88, 7.13) 0.001 4.91 (3.07, 7.84) <0.001
Sex
 Girls Ref.
 Boys 1.12 (0.92, 1.37) 0.250
Age
 5–9 ys 0.03 (0.01, 0.08) <0.001 0.02 (0.00, 0.07) <0.001 0.02 (0.01, 0.05) <0.001
 10–14 ys 0.18 (0.12, 0.27) <0.001 0.28 (0.19, 0.40) <0.001 0.22 (0.17, 0.29) <0.001
 15–19 ys Ref. Ref. Ref.
Residence area
 Rural Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Urban 1.21 (0.91, 1.59) 0.184 1.88 (1.41, 2.52) <0.001 1.49 (1.22, 1.82) <0.001

Multivariable Poisson regression model with the calendar year as a dummy variable, bold values indicate statistical significance