Table 2.
Methodological quality of nutrition guidelines as assessed with Agree II instrument
| Agree II Domain | Guideline 1 | Guideline 2 | Guideline 4 | Guideline 6 | Guideline 8 | Guideline 10 | Mean % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope and purpose | 86 | 100 | 100 | 78 | 89 | 86 | 90 |
| Stakeholder involvement | 78 | 78 | 50 | 44 | 78 | 72 | 67 |
| Rigor of development | 93 | 96 | 98 | 79 | 85 | 77 | 88 |
| Clarity of presentation | 92 | 94 | 89 | 67 | 83 | 89 | 86 |
| Applicability | 73 | 88 | 54 | 13 | 63 | 65 | 59 |
| Editorial independence | 96 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 99 |
The table shows the quality score of each domain