Table 1.
M0 at presentation (N = 57) |
M1 (N = 54) |
Total (N = 111) |
|
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
No | 15 (26.3%) | 14 (25.9%) | 29 (26.1%) |
Yes | 42 (73.7%) | 40 (74.1%) | 82 (73.9%) |
Age at Surgery (years) | |||
Mean | 62.0 | 58.5 | 60.3 |
Median | 63.6 | 59.1 | 61.4 |
Range | (34.9–78.8) | (38.2–73.7) | (34.9–78.8) |
Max Tumor Size (cm) | |||
Mean | 9.6 | 10.9 | 10.2 |
Median | 9.0 | 10.0 | 9.5 |
Range | (2.5–18.0) | (2.1–23.0) | (2.1–23.0) |
2010 pT | |||
Missing | 0 | 1 | 1 |
1A | 3 (5.3%) | 1 (1.9%) | 4 (3.6%) |
1B | 8 (14.0%) | 8 (15.1%) | 16 (14.5%) |
2A | 14 (24.6%) | 6 (11.3%) | 20 (18.2%) |
2B | 4 (7.0%) | 5 (9.4%) | 9 (8.2%) |
3A | 17 (29.8%) | 20 (37.7%) | 37 (33.6%) |
3B | 7 (12.3%) | 4 (7.5%) | 11 (10.0%) |
3C | 2 (3.5%) | 1 (1.9%) | 3 (2.7%) |
4 | 2 (3.5%) | 8 (15.1%) | 10 (9.1%) |
2010 pN | |||
0 | 18 (31.6%) | 20 (37.0%) | 38 (34.2%) |
1 | 4 (7.0%) | 9 (16.7%) | 13 (11.7%) |
X | 35 (61.4%) | 25 (46.3%) | 60 (54.1%) |
TNM Stage | |||
I | 11 (19.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (9.9%) |
II | 18 (31.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 18 (16.2%) |
III | 26 (45.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 26 (23.4%) |
IV | 2 (3.5%) | 54 (100.0%) | 56 (50.5%) |
Grade | |||
1 | 1 (1.8%) | 1 (1.9%) | 2 (1.8%) |
2 | 14 (24.6%) | 5 (9.3%) | 19 (17.1%) |
3 | 32 (56.1%) | 31 (57.4%) | 63 (56.8%) |
4 | 10 (17.5%) | 17 (31.5%) | 27 (24.3%) |
BAP1 IHC in Primary Tumor | |||
Negative | 13 (27.7%) | 6 (12.0%) | 19 (19.6%) |
Positive | 34 (72.3%) | 44 (88.0%) | 78 (80.4%) |
NAa | 14 | ||
PBRM1 IHC in Primary Tumor | |||
Negative | 28 (60.9%) | 27 (52.9%) | 55 (56.7%) |
Positive | 18 (39.1%) | 24 (47.1%) | 42 (43.2%) |
NAa | 14 | ||
Number of Longitudinal Metastases | |||
1 | 34 (59.6%) | 41 (75.9%) | 75 (67.6%) |
2 | 15 (26.3%) | 12 (22.2%) | 27 (24.3%) |
3 | 6 (10.5%) | 1 (1.9%) | 7 (6.3%) |
4 | 2 (3.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.8%) |
aDenotes that the IHC stain was unsuccessful