Abstract
As the world’s aging population grows, the surgical population is increasingly made up of older adults. Due to changes in physiologic function and increasing comorbidity burden, older adults are at increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and functional decline after surgery. In addition, decision to undergo surgery for the older adult may be based on the postoperative functional outcome rather than survival. Although few studies have evaluated an older adult’s function as a postoperative outcome, surgeons are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of maintaining or regaining function in an older patient. Interventions to improve postoperative functional outcomes are being developed and show promising results. This review discusses existing literature on postoperative functional outcomes in older adults and recently developed interventions.
Keywords: older adults, geriatrics, elderly, functional outcomes
Introduction
Worldwide, the proportion of those aged 65 and over is expected to increase in all developed countries between now and 2030. The United States Census Bureau projects that the population aged 65 and older will total 83.7 million and surviving baby boomers will be over the age of 85. With the continued growth of the older adult population and advances in surgical innovation, the number of older adults who will undergo surgery will continue to increase. Currently, the number of older adults, aged 65 and older, who undergo non-cardiac surgery is expected to double from 7 million to 14 million by 2030.1
As the surgical population is made up of a greater percentage of older adults, understanding postoperative functional outcomes in older adults is important. Over 70% of older adults place greater value in physical function ability over survival– they would not choose a treatment that caused severe functional impairment, even if survival were ensured [21]. Potential reasons may include a greater emphasis on the quality of life over quantity. Poorer functional status was found to predict higher levels of psychological distress and decreased quality of life in this age group [22]. In addition, functional dependency confers greater risk for postoperative complications and risk of discharge to a post-acute care facility [20].
This review aims to define functional outcome in older adults and describe potential contributions to poor functional outcome, present research findings on postoperative functional outcomes in older adults, and discuss recently developed interventions that focus on improving postoperative functional outcomes in older adults.
Functional outcome in the Older Surgical Patient
Functional status of the older adult is measured in two manners: self-report and performance-based measures. Self-reported measures include basic and instrumental activities of daily living, overall level of physical activity, and self-assessment of physical health. Assessments of basic and instrumental activities of daily living, such as with the use of the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) [17] and Lawton’s Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) [18], are usually short questionnaires that can easily be administered in the clinical setting to determine an older adult’s level of dependency (Table 1). Performance-based measures include evaluation of mobility, gait, walking capacity, and grip strength. Examples of performance tasks include the Timed Up and Go Test (mobility and gait), 6 minute walk test (gait and walking capacity), and the use of a handheld dynamometer (grip strength).
Table 1.
Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Lawton’s Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) [17, 18]
Activities of Daily Living:
|
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living:
|
Functional outcomes primarily consist of comparing postoperative self-reported and performance-based measures to preoperative measures. Some studies use discharge to a non-home institution and length of stay in a nursing home or rehabilitation facility as surrogate markers for postoperative functional decline and postoperative functional recovery, respectively. Of all the activities of daily living, those most associated with mobility – use of stairs, ambulation, and transferring – may be most important to the older adult in terms of their health status [23].
Risk factors for poor postoperative function outcome
Poor preoperative function (i.e. “baseline function”) has been a well-studied risk factor of poor postoperative function. Specifically, patients who experienced preoperative functional decline are at higher risk for postoperative functional decline [28]. The results from a study examining older women who underwent surgery for prolapse suggest that preoperative functional limitations predict the risk of increased functional limitations following surgery [34]. Another study examining the functional recovery of older adults following cardiac surgery found that preoperative ADL impairment predicted poorer recovery to baseline 4–6 weeks postoperatively [35].
Frailty, a measure of physiologic vulnerability, has been consistently linked to poor functional outcomes [29, 36]. Frailty is a multifactorial issue linked to poor nutrition, strength, mobility, depression, multimorbididty, and cognitive impairment. Poor nutrition may contribute to sarcopenia, muscle weakness, and low energy level. Poor psychosocial well-being may contribute to poor engagement in one’s own care and well-being, one of which includes functional activity. Multiple domains of frailty may act synergistically to place individuals as increased risk for functional decline.
Functional recovery over time
Physical functional recovery in older adults who have undergone major surgery is slow and limited. In a landmark study, Lawrence et al. (2004) [27] performed a large prospective cohort study of those aged 60 years or older who underwent major abdominal surgery. In their study, it took patients 6 weeks to 3 months to recover basic ADLs but up to 6 months to recover their IADLs [27]. Patients who had better preoperative physical status had a shorter time to recovery in their IADLs. In the very frail, functional outcomes were far worse. In a national study of nursing home residents aged 65 years of age and older who underwent colectomy for cancer had sustained decline in functional status at one year [28]. Ronning et al. (2013) [29] found patients 70 years of age and older who had elective resection of colorectal cancer had significant decreases in their ADLs and IADLs up to 16–28 months postoperatively. Notably, these individuals demonstrated no significant changes on their Timed Up and Go or grip strength measures at follow-up.
Following surgery, decline in functional status may be protracted in the older adult. Kwon et al. (2012) [30] found that a significant number of patients aged 65 years or older who underwent major, non-emergent abdominal or thoracic surgery had functional decline up to 1 year following surgery, as measured by the clinically significant increase of Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) [31] score of 0.1 or greater. The HAQ assesses functional status in eight domains – dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities [31]. Those with higher functional status at baseline, measured by Duke Activity Status Index and physical function score (gait speed, grip strength, balance, and standing speed), were found to recover more quickly – with improvement of HAQ scores starting at 3 months – but neither group returned to baseline functional status at 1 year [30].
Operations, such as lower extremity revascularization and hip fracture repair, whose aim is to maintain function, have poor functional outcomes in the very frail. Among nursing home residents who undergo lower extremity revascularization procedures, over half were dead or non-ambulatory after 1 year [32]. After hip fracture, less than a quarter of residents who were functionally intact before surgery were alive and independent 6 months after surgery [33].
Interventions to Improve Postoperative Functional Outcomes in the Older Adult
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatric Society preoperative guidelines recommend that all older surgical patients should have an assessment of functional status, suggesting the use of a 4-item screening test that evaluates independence in transferring, dressing and bathing, making meals, and shopping; the answer of “No” for any of the items should prompt a full assessment of their ADL and IADL [24]. This comprehensive assessment identifies older adults who are at higher risk of functional decline and who may benefit from interventions aimed at preserving function.
Pre-hospitalization Interventions
For elective surgical procedures, there is time during the preoperative period to address functional status dependency. Interventions to improve functional status during the preoperative period are commonly referred to as “prehabilitation.” Prehabilitation programs are usually composed of exercise programs that are initiated during the preoperative period. They may also employ adjunct interventions such as patient education about surgery and the recovery process, dietary counseling, protein supplementation, or anxiety and/or stress reduction. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies, 19 of which were randomized controlled trials, found that prehabilitation improved physical function, improved postoperative length of stay, and provided postoperative physical benefits in older surgical patients [47].
A single-center randomized controlled trial [48] found beneficial results with implementation of a prehabilitation exercise program in the preoperative period for those older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Those who were able to improve their functional walking capacity preoperatively were more likely to return to their baseline walking capacity within 6 months postoperatively, reported better scores on the SF-36 in the areas of mental health, vitality, general health perception, and had improved cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by the VO2peak. Those who deteriorated during the prehabilitation period were at greater risk of surgical complications and intensive care management, suggesting that the intervention could itself serve potentially as an assessment tool for postoperative morbidity.
Another pilot study investigating the effect of prehabilitation on patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer used the 6 minute walk test as their primary outcome [49]. The intervention, called the Peri Operative Program (POP), added nutritional counseling, protein supplementation, and anxiety reduction to moderate aerobic exercise and resistance training. Patients were able to improve their functional walking capacity prior to surgery and had better walking capacity 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively compared to the control group. A randomized controlled trial is currently ongoing at McGill University to further investigate the impact of the program.
An increasing number of healthcare systems have adopted some version of preoperative geriatric surgical care with potential to improve postoperative functional outcomes in older adults. Several models include the multi-disciplinary theme of physical therapy, occupational therapy, nutrition, and geriatric medicine. Each discipline contributes through evaluation and optimization of patient characteristics that may contribute to a poorer functional outcome (i.e. poor nutrition, reversible delirium risk).
An additional preoperative intervention that prevents poor postoperative functional outcomes is one that involves eliciting patient values and goals. With the understanding that many older adults value quality of life, which for many includes functional independence, over quantity of life, not undergoing an operation that likely leads to loss or decline of functional independence may be one method of aligning intervention with patient-centered outcome. In such circumstances, patient engagement with palliative care may be offered.
Inpatient Interventions
A multicenter randomized controlled trial [50] of 1,388 hospitalized older patients on both medical and surgical units found that the implementation of an inpatient intervention with a focus on maintenance of the patient’s functional status had significant improvements in activities of daily living (p <0.001) and physical performance (p <0.001) at discharge compared to usual care. In addition, patients who received the inpatient intervention self-reported significantly better scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) in the areas of physical functioning (p = 0.006), general health (p = 0.006), and bodily pain (p = 0.001) at discharge compared to those who had usual care.
Other smaller scale studies have demonstrated the value of such inpatient interventions in the geriatric surgical population. Implementation of a modified Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) intervention [51] that included ambulation or active range-of-motion exercise 3 times daily resulted in significantly less functional decline at discharge (p < 0.001) in older adults who had had abdominal surgery compared to usual care. Another inpatient intervention based on HELP called “CareWell in Hospital” (CWH) [52] showed a small improvement in ADLs in their geriatric surgical patients between discharge and 3 months post-discharge compared to pre-implementation (7.7 vs. 4.5, p = 0.035) but effects were influenced by a learning curve of the hospital staff slowing successful implementation.
A study of older adults who underwent open cardiac surgery and participated in an inpatient rehabilitation program [53] were able to improve their Functional Independence Measure scores from admission to discharge from 76.1 ± 17.1 to 96.7 ± 19.4 (p <0.001). Improvement from admission to discharge in the subcategories of self-care (eating, grooming, bathing, dressing upper body, dressing lower body, going to the bathroom) of 25.1 to 33.9 (p < 0.001) and transfers (to bed, chair/wheelchair, toilet, and tub/shower) of 10.4 to 14.8 (p < 0.001) were also seen. Notably, these improvements were seen over a relatively short period of time – length of stay ranged from 2 to 25 days – but analysis of this change in functional status is limited by the lack of a control group for comparison.
A current model of care that is being developed in the hospital setting includes the mobile ACE unit. The Acute Care of Elders (ACE) model was initially developed for older adults hospitalized for an acute medical condition and was shown to improve a community dwelling older adult’s likelihood of maintaining function and returning to their home versus admission to a nursing home. The mobile ACE unit, consisting of a geriatrician-led interdisciplinary team, is being developed in hopes to assist in decreasing functional loss from surgical hospitalization.
Post-discharge Interventions
Interventions implemented after discharge may also improve the functional status of the geriatric surgical patient. Preliminary data from a prospective study investigating the effect of a quality improvement program [54] found that ordering physical therapy consults and home health nursing on discharge for those patients aged 65 or older who underwent general or vascular surgery operations and had a score of 3 or greater on the Vulnerable Elder Survey resulted in significantly better functional status 30 days after discharge in their post-intervention group (p < 0.01). Implementation of a 12-month high-intensity progressive resistance training program 6–8 weeks after hip fracture in the Hip Fracture Intervention Trial (HIPFIT) [55] resulted in significantly less decline in ADL toileting (p < 0.05) and transferring (p = 0.04) at one year than those who received usual care. Twelve weeks of progressive aquatic resistance training [56] resulted in improvement in the functional status of older adults after unilateral knee replacement, as measured by increases in habitual walking speed (p = 0.005) and decreased stair ascending time (p = 0.006).
Clinical Pathways
Interventions that span multiple components of the perioperative setting are being developed; yet, few have been studied. Proactive Care of Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS) [57] for those adults aged 65 and older who underwent elective orthopedic surgery included pre-hospitalization, inpatient, and post-discharge multidisciplinary interventions was developed in 2008. Implementation of the program resulted in the reduction of dependent transfers on postoperative day 3 from 14.8% to 0% (p = 0.003), length of stay from 15.8 ± 13.2 to 11.5 ± 5.2 (p = 0.028), and delayed discharge due to slow rehabilitation from 13.0% to 7.4%. Another intervention called the Start to Finish (STF) program [58] utilized prehospitalization and inpatient interventions to successfully achieve shorter mean length of stay (8.4 vs. 11.0 days, p = 0.029) but achieved similar high rates of total functional recovery 6 weeks post-discharge (98.2% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.189).
Geriatric surgical care pathways that span the peri-operative period are being developed at different health systems. The intent of these care models are multi-fold, one of which includes maintaining functional independence in the older surgical adult. An example of several U.S. based pathways incorporates a preoperative intervention with a hospital intervention. “Geri-ERAS”, an ERAS protocol adapted for the geriatric population that has an emphasis on maintenance of function, is currently being piloted at our institution.
Conclusion
Postoperative functional status is an important patient-centered outcome. Living independently is one of the most important aspects in deciding to undergo surgery. While an important outcome, limited information is available about postoperative functional outcomes of major surgery. Risk factors for poor functional recovery include baseline frailty, functional disability and cognitive impairment. Innovative multi-component care pathways aimed at improving functional recovery in older adults are gaining traction globally.
As greater numbers of older adults choose to undergo surgery, it is increasingly important to be able to identify older surgical patients who are at greater risk for poor postoperative functional outcomes. Further research in postoperative functional outcomes of older adults is necessary to inform decision-making in this population. Lastly, more research is needed to determine evidence-based content of care pathways aimed at improving functional recovery after surgery.
Footnotes
Klopfenstein CE, Herrmann FR, Michel JP, et al. The influence of an aging surgical population on the anesthesia workload: a ten-year survey. Anesthesia and analgesia 1998;86(6):1165–70.
References
- 1.Colloca G, Santoro M, Gambassi G. Age-related physiologic changes and perioperative management of elderly patients. Surgical Oncology. 2010;19:124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Richardson JD, Cocanour CS, Kern JA, Garrison RN, Kirton OC, Cofer JB, Thomason MH. Perioperative risk assessment in elderly and high-risk patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2004;199(1):133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cheng S, Yang T, Jeng K, Lee J, Liu T, Liu C. Perioperative care of the elderly. International Journal of Gerontology. 2007;1(2):89–97. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cooper Z, Scott JW, Rosenthal RA, Mitchell SL. Emergency major abdominal surgical procedures in older adults: A systematic review of mortality and functional outcomes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2015;63:2563–2571. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Curiel-Balsera E, Mora-Ordoñez JM, Castillo-Lorente E, Benitez-Parejo J, Herruzo-Avilés A, Ravina-Sanz JJ, Rivera-Fernandez R. Mortality and complications in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Journal of Critical Care. 2013;28(4):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.12.011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.De la Fuente SG, Bennett KM, Pappas TN, Scarborough JE. Pre- and intraoperative variables affecting early outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB. 2011;13(12):887–892. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00390.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deyo RA, Hickam D, Duckart JP, Piedra M. Complications after surgery for lumbar stenosis in a veteran population. Spine. 2013;38(19):1695–1702. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829f65c1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Elia C, Schoenfeld C, Bayer O, Ewald C, Reinhart K, Sakr Y. The impact of age on outcome after major surgical procedures. Journal of Critical Care. 2013;28(4):413–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.12.010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, Jones RS. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2006;203(6):865–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bettelli G. Preoperative evaluation in geriatric surgery: comorbidity, functional status and pharmacological history. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2011;77(6):637–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cohan JN, Bacchetti P, Varma MG, Finlayson E. Outcomes after ileoanal pouch surgery in frail and older adults. Journal of Surgical Research. 2015;198(2):327–333. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lavelle K, Sowerbutts AM, Bundred N, Pilling M, Todd C. Pretreatment health measures and complications after surgical management of elderly women with breast cancer. British Journal of Surgery. 2015;102(6):653–667. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mahdi H, Lockhart D, Maurer KA. Impact of age on 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2015;137:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nanjo Y, Nagashima H, Dokai T, Hamamoto Y, Hirokazu H, Ishii H, Teshima R. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 80 years or older: A multi-center retrospective study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2013;133(9):1243–1248. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1808-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dewan SK, Zheng SB, Xia SJ. Preoperative geriatric assessment: comprehensive, multidisciplinary and proactive. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2012;23:487–494. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Demongeot J. Biological boundaries and biological age. Acta Biotheoretica. 2009;57:397–418. doi: 10.1007/s10441-009-9087-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leung JM, Dzankic S. Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intraoperative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49(8):1080–1085. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mohanty S, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Kmiecik TE, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY. Risk of discharge to postacute care: A patient-centered outcome for the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator. JAMA Surgery. 2015;150(5):480–484. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H. Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(14):1061–1066. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Atkins J, Naismith SL, Luscombe GM, Hickie IB. Psychological distress and quality of life in older persons: relative contributions of fixed and modifiable risk factors. BMC Psychiatry. 2013:13–249. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gama EV, Damián J, Pérez del Molino J, López MR, López Pérez M, Gavira Iglesias FJ. Association of individual activities of daily living with self-rated health in older people. Age and Ageing. 2000;29(3):267–270. doi: 10.1093/ageing/29.3.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF. Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: A best practices guideline form the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2012;215(4):453–466. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang L, van Belle G, Kukull WB, Larson EB. Predictors of functional change: A longitudinal study of nondemented people aged 65 and older. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2002;50(9):1525–1534. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50408.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Deckx L, van den Akker M, Daniels L, de Jonge ET, Bulens P, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Buntinx F. Geriatric screening tools are of limited value to predict decline in functional status and quality of life: Results of a cohort study. BMC Family Practice. 2015:16–30. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0241-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, Pederson T, Bradshaw PT, Mulrow CD, Page CP. Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2004;199(5):762–772. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Finlayson E, Zhao S, Boscardin WJ, Fries BE, Landefeld CS, Dudley RA. Functional status after colon cancer surgery in elderly nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2012;60(5):967–973. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03915.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ronning B, Wyller TB, Jordhoy MS, Nesbakken A, Bakka A, Seljeflot I, Kristjansson S. Frailty indicators and functional status in older patients after colorectal cancer surgery. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2014;5(1):26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.08.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2013.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kwon S, Symons R, Yukawa M, Dasher N, Legner V, Flum DR. Evaluating the association of preoperative functional status and postoperative functional decline in older patients undergoing major surgery. The American Journal of Surgery. 2012;78(12):1336–1344. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: Dimensions and practical applications. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003;1:20–26. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oresanya L, Zhao S, Gan S, Fries BE, Goodney PP, Covinsky KE, Finlayson E. Functional outcomes after lower extremity revascularization in nursing home residents: A national cohort study. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015;175(6):951–957. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Neuman MD, Silber JH, Magaziner JS, Passarella MA, Mehta S, Werner RM. Survival and functional outcomes after hip fracture among nursing home residents. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014;174(8):1273–1280. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Greer JA, Harvie HS, Andy UU, Smith AL, Northington GM, Arya LA. Short-term postoperative functional outcomes in older women undergoing prolapse surgery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;125(3):551–558. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Min L, Mazzurco L, Gure TR, Cigolle CT, Lee P, Bloem C, Malani PN. Longitudinal functional recovery after geriatric cardiac surgery. Journal of Surgical Research. 2014;194(1):25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M, Kawamura T, Kitagawa Y, Okawa Y, Fukata S. Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancers. Annals of Surgery. 2007;246(2):222–228. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180caa3fb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Partridge JSL, Fuller M, Harari D, Taylor PR, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. Frailty and poor functional status are common in arterial vascular surgical patients and affect postoperative outcomes. International Journal of Surgery. 2015;18:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Visnjevac O, Lee J, Pourafkari L, Dosluoglu HH, Nader ND. Functional capacity as a significant independent predictor of postoperative mortality for octogenarian ASA-III patients. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2014;68(10):1229–1235. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Amrock LG, Neuman MD, Lin H, Deiner S. Can routine preoperative data predict adverse outcomes in the elderly? Development and validation of a simple risk model incorporating a chart-derived frailty score. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014;219(4):684–694. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Basques BA, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, Leslie MP, Baumgaertner MR, Grauer JN. Postoperative length of stay and 30-day readmission after geriatric hip fracture: An analysis of 8434 patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2015;29(3):e115–120. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Feng MA, McMillan DT, Crowell K, Muss H, Nielsen ME, Smith AB. Geriatric assessment in surgical oncology: A systematic review. Journal of Surgical Research. 2014;193(1):265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.PACE Participants. Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2008;65(2):156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li LT, Mills WL, White DL, Li A, Gutierrez AM, Berger DH, Naik AD. Causes and prevalence of unplanned readmissions after colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2013;61(7):1175–1181. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ting B, Zurakowski D, Herder L, Wagner K, Appleton P, Rodriguez EK. Preinjury ambulatory status is associated with 1-year motality following lateral compression Type I fractures in the geriatric population older than 80 years. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014;76(5):1306–1309. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chou C, Hwang C, Wu Y. Effect of exercise on physical function, daily living activities, and quality of life in the frail older adults: A meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012;93(2):237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Theou O, Stathokostas L, Roland KP, Jakobi JM, Patterson C, Vandervoort AA, Jones GR. The effectiveness of exercise interventions for the management of frailty: A systematic review. Journal of Aging Research. 2011 doi: 10.4061/2011/569194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Santa Mina D, Clarke H, Ritvo P, Leung YW, Matthew AG, Katz J, Alibhai SMH. Effect of total-body prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(3):196–207. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Charlebois P, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: Argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011;150(3):505–514. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li C, Carli F, Lee L, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman AS, Feldman LS. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: A pilot study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2013;27(4):1072–1082. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2560-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cohen HJ, Feussner JR, Weinberger M, Carnes M, Hamdy RC, Hsieh F, Lavori P. A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(12):905–912. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa010285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen CC, Lin M, Tien Y, Yen C, Huang G, Inouye SK. Modified hospital elder life program: Effects on abdominal surgery patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011;213(2):245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bakker FC, Persoon A, Bredie SJH, van Haren-Willems J, Leferink VJ, Noyez L, Olde Rikkert MGM. The CareWell in Hospital program to improve the quality of care for frail elderly inpatients: Results of a before-after study with focus on surgical patients. The American Journal of Surgery. 2014;208(5):735–746. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.04.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kong K, Kevorkian CG, Rossi CD. Functional outcomes of patients on a rehabilitation unit after open heart surgery. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation. 1996;16(6):413–418. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199611000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cronin J, Livhits M, Mercado C, Chen F, Foster N, Chandler C, Chen DC. Quality improvement pilot program for vulnerable elderly surgical patients. The American Surgeon. 2011;77(10):1305–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Singh NA, Quine S, Clemson LM, Williams EJ, Williamson DA, Stavrinos TM, Singh MAF. Effects of high-intensity progressive resistance training and targeted multidisciplinary treatment of frailty on mortality and nursing home admissions after hip fracture: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2012;13(1):24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Valtonen A, Pöyhönen T, Sipilä S, Heinonen A. Effects of aquatic resistance training on mobility limitation and lower-limb impairments after knee replacement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010;91(6):833–839. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Harari D, Hopper A, Dhesi J, Babic-Illman G, Lockwood L, Martin F. Proactive care of older people undergoing surgery (‘POPS’): Designing, embedding, evaluating and funding a comprehensive geriatric assessment service for older elective surgical patients. Age and Ageing. 2007;36(2):190–196. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chia CLK, Mantoo SK, Tan KY. ‘Start to finish trans-institutional transdisciplinary care’: A novel approach improves colorectal surgical results in frail elderly patients. Colorectal Disease. 2016;18(1):43–50. doi: 10.1111/codi.13166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
