Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 22;12(3):e0174137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174137

Fig 1. Comparison of coronary reactive hyperemia (CRH) between Tie2-CYP2J2 Tr and WT mice.

Fig 1

Repayment volume (A), repayment duration (B), and repayment/debt ratio (C), were increased in Tie2-CYP2J2 Tr compared to WT mice (P < 0.05). Baseline CF (D) was not different between the two groups. * P < 0.05 versus WT. n = 8 per group.