Table 3. Pairwise comparisons of F_ST between Lake Sturgeon sample groups.

Fast-growing and slow-growing downstream sub-groups assigned as per Fig 2. Statistical significance was evaluated after a sequential Bonferonni correction (α = 0.008). Statistically significant comparisons are shown in bold.

Group 1	Group 2	FST	p
Upstream adults	Upstream juveniles	0.00142	0.133 ± 0.003
Upstream adults	Downstream juveniles	0.0114	0.0000 ± 0.0000
Upstream adults	Fast-growing downstream	0.00661	0.0443 ± 0.002
Upstream adults	Slow-growing downstream	0.0134	0.0000 ± 0.0000
Upstream juveniles	Downstream juveniles	0.0108	0.0000 ± 0.0000
Upstream juveniles	Fast-growing downstream	0.00116	0.377 ± 0.005
Upstream juveniles	Slow-growing downstream	0.0141	0.0000 ± 0.0000
Fast-growing downstream	Slow-growing downstream	0.00353	0.152 ± 0.004