Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 25;4:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2017.01.003

Table 1.

Study Design

Rapa (mg/kg) Borta (mg/kg) Predb (mg/kg) Number of Mice Assayedc
Pre-IS IS-4w IS-8w
Experiment 1

non-IS 9 9 9
RH 2.0 (i.p.) 15 15 13
BH 2.0 (i.p.) 5 5 5
PH 0.5 (i.p.) 5 5 5
BH + PL 2.0 (i.p.) 0.5 (i.p.) 5 5 5
BL + PL 1.0 (i.p.) 0.5 (i.p.) 4 4 4
BL + PH 1.0 (i.p.) 0.75 (i.p.) 4 4 4
RH + PL 2.0 (i.p.) 0.5 (i.p.) 5 4 3
RH + PH 2.0 (i.p.) 0.75 (i.p.) 5 4 3

Experiment 2

RH + PL 2.0 (i.p.) 0.5 (i.p.) 13 13 10
RL + PL 1.0 (i.p.) 0.5 (i.p.) 6 6 6
RL + PL(O) 2.0 (i.p.) 0.5 (oral) 5 5 5
non-IS 5 5 5

WT mice were immunized with an i.p. injection of 1 × 1010vg/kg rAAV9 vector and then treated with different IS agents starting 5 weeks pi. Pre-IS, prior to IS; IS-4w, 4 weeks on IS treatment; IS-8w, 8 weeks on IS treatment; non-IS, non-treated controls; R, Rap; B, Bort; P, Pred; H, high dose; L, low dose.

a

Every other day.

b

Daily.

c

Decreases in study subjects over time were due to unexpected loss from blood draw or injections.