Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;104(5):513–524. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10476

Table 2.

Characteristics of included reviews and numbers of RCTs by types of intervention

Types of intervention compared
Surgical treatments Surgery versus non‐surgical invasive treatments Surgery versus non‐invasive treatments Non‐surgical invasive versus non‐invasive treatments Non‐surgical invasive treatments Non‐invasive treatments
Bowel conditions (42 reviews, 47 RCTs*) 14 reviews 14 reviews 4 reviews 1 review 2 reviews 7 reviews
8 RCTs 12 RCTs 0 RCTs 0 RCTs 8 RCTs 21 RCTs
Appendicitis (40 reviews, 106 RCTs) 33 reviews 0 7 reviews 0 0 0
100 RCTs 6 RCTs
Gallstone disease (17 reviews, 57 RCTs) 11 reviews 2 reviews 0 4 reviews 0 0
47 RCTs 3 RCTs 7 RCTs
Peptic ulcer disease (4 reviews, 4 RCTs) 4 reviews 0 0 0 0 0
4 RCTs
Anorectal soft tissue infection (2 reviews, 6 RCTs) 2 reviews 0 0 0 0 0
6 RCTs
Abdominal wall hernia (1 review, 0 RCTs) 1 review§ 0 0 0 0 0
0 RCTs
Total (106 reviews, 220 RCTs) 65 reviews 16 reviews 11 reviews 5 reviews 2 reviews 7 reviews
165 RCTs 15 RCTs 6 RCTs 7 RCTs 8 RCTs 21 RCTs

Number of reviews and number of unique RCTs included in reviews are shown. Non‐surgical invasive treatments include all endoscopic or radiological procedures; non‐invasive treatments include all pharmacological interventions (such as antibiotics, intravenous fluid regimens).

*

Two RCTs were included in multiple reviews across two different intervention comparisons (surgical versus surgical treatments and surgical versus non‐surgical invasive treatments) and were therefore included in both intervention categories.

Review included 25 non‐randomized case series (no comparator) reporting outcomes from a total of 315 patients.

Surgery versus radiological treatments.

§

Review included 17 non‐randomized case series studies (no comparator) reporting outcomes from a total of 28 patients, of which only 8 single‐patient case reports were in emergency settings.