Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 12;45(3):138–144. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22421

Table 1.

Of All 69 Patients with 133 Liver Tumors, Patients' Characteristics, Locations of Primary Lesions and Liver Tumors, Size of Liver Tumors, Diagnosis of Liver Tumors, Methods of Final Diagnosis of Liver Tumors, and Interval Between Performances of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasonography (CEUS) and Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced MRI (EOB‐MRI)

Characteristics All (n = 69)
Age (years) (mean ± SD) 66 ± 12
Gender
Male/female 46/23
Locations of primary lesions
Rectum 27
Sigmoid colon 22
Descending colon 0
Transverse colon 10
Ascending colon 8
Cecum 2
Liver tumors 133
Liver metastases/others 109/24
Others
Hepatic hemangioma 11
Liver cyst 9
Hepatocellular carcinoma 2
Bile duct adenoma 1
Necrosis after treatment 1
Tumor size (mm) (mean ± SD) 21.3 ± 17.9
Locations of liver tumors (Couinaud's segment)
S1 2
S2 7
S3 11
S4 23
S5 14
S6 25
S7 20
S8 31
Final definite diagnosis
Histopathological examination 61
Various imaging modalities 72
Interval between performance of CEUS and EOB‐MRI (days) (mean ± SD) 11 ± 12.5

Abbreviations: CEUS, contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography; EOB‐MRI: Gd‐EOB‐DTPA enhanced‐MRI.