Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 17;11:851–864. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S124399

Table 1.

Summary of basic characteristics of studies selected for meta-analysis

Study (year published) Study design Treatment Number of patients Mean age, years Male gender Follow-up time, months Child–Pugh class, number (%) Cancer stage, no (%) Type of viral hepatitis, number (%)
Lee et al,18 2015 RCT Surgery/RFA/PEI + CIK 114 55.4 83.3% NR NR AJCC
I: 98 (86.0%)
II: 16 (14.0%)
HBV only: 96 (84.2%)
HCV only: 9 (7.9%)
HBV + HCV: 2 (1.8%)
Others: 7 (6.1%)
Surgery/RFA/PEI 112 56.4 81.3% AJCC
I: 94 (83.9%)
II: 18 (16.1%)
HBV only: 90 (80.4%)
HCV only: 10 (8.9%)
HBV + HCV: 2 (1.8%)
Others: 10 (8.9%)
Guo et al,33 2014 Retrospective TACE + CIK 30 ≤60: 43.3%
>60: 56.7%
90.0% Range: 2–43 A: 24 (80%)
B: 6 (20%)
BCLC
A: 5 (16.7%)
B: 15 (50%)
C: 10 (33.3%)
HBsAg+: 28 (93.3%)
TACE only 38 ≤60: 34.2%
>60: 65.8%
89.5% A: 31 (81.6%)
B: 7 (18.4%)
BCLC
A: 5 (13.1%)
B: 21 (55.3%)
C: 12 (31.6%)
HBsAg+: 36 (94.7%)
Yu et al23 2014 RCT Standard treatment + CIK 66 <60: 56.1%
≥60: 43.9%
87.9% Median: 18.6 A: 62
B: 4
BCLC
A: 8
B: 31
C: 27
Hepatitis B: 35
Standard treatment 66 <60: 65.2%
≥60: 34.8%
87.9% A: 62
B: 4
BCLC
A: 8
B: 31
C: 27
Hepatitis B: 37
Pan et al,17 2013 Retrospective Surgery alone 206 50.03 86.9% Median: 60 NR Pathology
I: 17
II: 92
III: 97
HBsAg+: 176
HBeAg+: 182
Surgery + CIK 204 49.16 87.3% Pathology
I: 18
II: 102
III: 84
HBsAg+: 47
HBeAg+: 43
Huang et al,16 2013 Retrospective TACE + RFA + CIK 85 50a 90.6% Median (range): 78 (5–173) A: 76
B: 9
BCLC
A: 36
B: 29
C: 20
HBV: 66
TACE + RFA 89 53a 88.8% A: 74
B: 15
BCLC
A: 37
B: 34
C: 18
HBV: 69
Tong et al,28 2013 Prospective TACE + CIK
TACE only
20
18
56 NR NR NR NR NR
Deng et al,24 2013 RCT TACE + RFA 21 ≥50: 81.0%
<50: 19.0%
52.4% NR A: 19
B: 2
NR HBsAg+: 20
TACE + RFA + CIK 20 ≥50: 65.0%
<50: 35.0%
90.0% A: 18
B: 2
HBsAg+: 17
He et al,25 2012 RCT TACE only 58 52.1 86.2% Mean: 40 A: 49
B: 9
NR NR
TACE + CIK 60 56.3 93.3% A: 54
B: 6
Wang et al,30 2012 Prospective TACE + RFA + CIK 38 53 89.5% Mean: 44 A: 27
B: 11
NR HBV: 31
TACE + RFA 38 55 86.8% A: 25
B: 13
HBV: 32
Hao et al,15 2010 Prospective TACE + CIK 72 53a 90.3% NR A: 65
B: 7
BCLC
A: 7
B: 6
C: 59
HBsAg+: 68
TACE only 74 51a 86.5% A: 66 B: 8 BCLC
A: 5
B: 4
C: 65
HBsAg+: 68
Dong et al,14 2009 RCT Surgery + CIK-I 41 ≥50: 65.9%
<50: 34.1%
75.6% NR A: 34
B: 7
NR HBsAg+: 32
Surgery + CIK-II 43 ≥50: 60.5%
<50: 39.5%
74.4% A: 34
B: 9
HBsAg+: 33
Surgery only 43 ≥50: 65.1%
<50: 34.9%
79.1% A: 34
B: 9
HBsAg+: 31
Yu et al,32 2009 Prospective Surgery + TACE + CIK 25 49 88.0% Range: 3–34 A: 24
B: 1
Clinical
I: 0
II: 8
III: 15
IV: 2
NR
Surgery + supportive therapy 25 52 92.0% A: 20
B: 5
Clinical
I: 1
II: 9
III: 14
IV: 1
Weng et al,13 2008 RCT TACE + RFA + CIK 45 43a 68.9% Max: 18 A: 36 (80%)
B: 9 (20%)
NR NR
TACE + RFA 40 45a 72.5% A: 33 (82.5%)
B: 7 (17.5%)
Huang et al,26 2007 RCT TACE + RFA + CIK
TACE + RFA
55
30
46.2
47.1
67.3%
70.0%
NR NR NR NR
Shi et al,31 2007 Prospective TACE + CIK 38 NR NR NR NR Okuda
I: 8
II: 13
III: 7
NR
TACE 134 Okuda
I: 2
II: 106
III: 26
Hao et al,29 2006 Prospective TACE + CIK 21 50.90 81.0% NR A: 15
B: 4
C: 2
Clinical
I: 2
II: 16
III: 3
HBV infection: 21
TACE only 46 49.83 97.8% A: 34
B: 9
C: 3
Clinical
I: 4
II: 39
III: 3
HBV infection: 44
Zhang et al,27
2006
RCT TACE only
TACE + CIK
TACE + PEI
TACE + PEI + CIK
30
16
62
36
45.5 75.0% NR NR NR NR

Note:

a

Data for age are presented as the median.

Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; CIK, cytokine-induced killer cells; HBsAg, surface antigen of the hepatitis B virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NR, not recorded; PEI, percutaneous ethanol injection; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.