Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 17;8:221–227. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S127318

Table 2.

Students’ perception of teachers

Questionnaire Mean±SD Strongly agree,
n (%)
Agree,
n (%)
True sometimes,
n (%)
Disagree,
n (%)
Strongly disagree,
n (%)
F-value
(P-value)*
The teachers are good at providing feedback to students 3.12±0.96 3 (4.8) 20 (32.3) 25 (40.3) 10 (16.1) 4 (6.5) 0.35 (0.55)
The teachers have good communications skills with patients 3.62±0.90 11 (17.7) 22 (35.5) 26 (41.9) 1 (1.6) 2 (3.2) 0.23 (0.62)
The teachers are knowledgeable 4.01±0.75 15 (24.2) 35 (56.5) 11 (17.7) 0 (0) 1 (1.6) 0.24 (0.62)
The teachers give clear examples 3.77±0.85 13 (21.0) 25 (40.3) 22 (35.5) 1 (1.6) 1 (1.6) 0.20 (0.65)
The teachers are well prepared for their classes 3.66±0.97 12 (19.4) 24 (38.7) 22 (35.5) 1 (1.6) 3 (4.8) 0.04 (0.83)
The teachers provide constructive criticism here 3.29±1.03 8 (12.9) 17 (27.4) 25 (40.3) 9 (14.5) 3 (4.8) 0.01 (0.91)
The teachers ridicule the students 2.96±0.92 4 (6.5) 9 (14.5) 34 (54.8) 11 (17.7) 4 (6.5) 1.98 (0.16)
The teachers get angry in class 3.19±0.82 1 (1.6) 10 (16.1) 23 (37.1) 23 (37.1) 5 (8.1) 2.76 (0.10)
The teachers are authoritarian 3.19±0.82 3 (4.8) 18 (29.0) 30 (48.4) 10 (16.1) 1 (1.6) 1.08 (0.30)
The teachers are patient with patients 3.69±0.75 8 (12.9) 29 (46.8) 24 (38.7) 0 (0) 1 (1.6) 0.49 (0.48)
The students irritate the teachers 2.85±0.76 0 (0) 12 (19.4) 31 (50) 17 (27.4) 2 (3.2) 0.005 (0.94)

Notes: Overall mean±SD was 3.39±0.37; total mean score was 37.35;

*

ANOVA significant level 0.05.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; SD, standard deviation.