. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Law Hum Behav. 2017 Feb 2;41(2):173–179. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000226

Table 2. Regression Results for Witnessing Domestic Violence.

1.	B	SE B	β	R²	ΔR²	95% CI
PCL-R	.18	.05	.32	.11	.09	.09, .29
Factor 1	.27	.12	.23	.11	.04	.05, .56
Factor 2	.13	.12	.14	.11	.01	-.10, .38
Facet 1	.26	.20	.15		.01	-.14, .66
Facet 2	.28	.28	.12	.08	.008	-.18, .99
Facet 3	.13	.26	.06		.001	-.51, .54
Facet 4	.15	.15	.11		.008	-.11, .50

2.	B	SE B	β	R²	ΔR²	95% CI

PCL-R	.14	.05	.25	.34	.06	.07, .27
Factor 1	.18	.11	.15		.02	.02, .47
Factor 2	.12	.11	.13	.33	.009	-.08, .35
Facet 1	.38	.17	.20		.03	.07, .79
Facet 2	-.22	.26	-.09	.35	.005	-.70, .39
Facet 3	.38	.25	.18		.02	-.04, .96
Facet 4	.10	.14	.06		.003	-.18, .38

Note: 1. age, race, IQ, SES included as covariates,

2. age, race, IQ, SES, physical abuse included as covariates Bolded p < .05