Table 3. Comparison of right ventricular volume between 3D echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance.
| Studies | Subjects | n | EDV (ml)* | ESV (ml) | EF (%) | Feasibility (%) |
| Jenkins et al., Chest 2007 | AMI | 50 | -3 ± 10 | -4 ± 7 | 2 ± 4 | 100 |
| Grapsa et al., Eur J Echocardiogr 2010 | PAH | 60 | -4 (-11, 4) | 0 (-6, 6). | -1 (-3, 0) | 100 |
| Sugeng et al., JACC Imaging 2010 | Mixed | 28 | -14 (-28, 0) | -9 (-19, 1) | -2 (-4, 0) | 93 |
| van der Zwaan et al., JASE 2010 | CHD | 50 | -34 (-43, -25) | -11 (-19, 3) | -4 (-6, -2) | 81 |
| Leibundgut et al., JASE 2010 | Mixed | 88 | -10 (-15, -6) | -5 (-8, -1) | 0 (-2, 1) | 88 |
| Medvedofsky et al., JASE 2015 | Mixed | 147 | -11 ± 20 | -0.3 ± 15 | -3 ± 8 | 89 |
AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CHD, congenital heart disease; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end-systolic volume; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension.
* Mean difference between 3DE and MRI, with mean ± SD, with 95% confidence interval.