Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 3;91(4):1565–1594. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1856-y

Table 7.

Results summary for NRT and reproduction/development—preterm birth

CAF no.a References Comparisonb Casesc OR/RR (95 % CI)d
8 Gaither et al. (2009) Prescribed/recommended NRT versus not 66/156 1.88 (0.97–3.56)e
10 Wisborg et al. (2000) Nicotine versus placebo patch 10/13 0.8 (0.4–1.7)f
13 Pollak et al. (2007) Any NRT + CBT versus CBT only 24/9 1.37 (0.68–2.75)g
14 Oncken et al. (2008) Nicotine versus placebo gum 7/16 0.39 (0.17–0.91)g
16 Coleman et al. (2012b) Nicotine versus placebo patch 40/45 0.90 (0.58–1.41)h
17 El-Mohandes et al. (2013) Nicotine patch + CBT versus CBT only 1/2 0.50 (0.05–5.18)g
18 Berlin et al. (2014) Nicotine versus placebo patch 27/26 1.03 (0.63–1.71)i
Meta-analysis (n = 7) Fixed effect 0.99 (0.78–1.26)
Random effect 0.98 (0.70–1.37)
Heterogeneity p 0.12

a CAF critical assessment form. CAF 8 is a cross-sectional study and the rest are clinical trials

b CBT cognitive behavioural therapy

cExposed/unexposed cases

d OR odds ratio, RR relative risk

eRR adjusted for age, marital status, education and race/ethnicity; estimated from data provided

fUnadjusted RR

gUnadjusted RR estimated from data provided

hOR adjusted for recruitment centre

iUnadjusted OR