Table 4.
Condoms and at-home human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test kit ordered from an HIV prevention app by men who have sex with men (MSM) participants during a 4-month pilot study, United States, 2015.
| Characteristic |
|
Total (n=121) n (%) |
Atlanta (n=72) n (%) |
Seattle (n=49) n (%) |
| Condom ordersa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 1st visit | 64 (52.9) |
38 (52.8) |
26 (53.1) |
|
|
At least once during pilot | 77 (63.6) |
47 (65.3) |
30 (61.2) |
|
|
Place repeat order | 29 (24.0) |
16 (22.2) |
13 (26.5) |
| At-home HIV test ordersa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 1st visit | 37 (30.6) |
28 (38.9) |
9 (18.4) |
|
|
At least once during pilot | 64 (52.9) |
39 (54.2) |
27 (55.1) |
|
|
Placed a repeat order | 26 (21.5) |
18 (25.0) |
8 (16.0) |
|
|
|
n=70 | n=45 | n=25 |
| Used the ordered condomsb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes | 61 (87.1) |
40 (88.9) |
21 (84.0) |
|
|
No | 9 (12.9) |
5 (11.1) |
4 (16.0) |
| Condoms replaced condoms would have bought or received elsewhereb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes | 51 (72.9) |
31 (68.9) |
20 (80.0) |
|
|
No | 18 (25.7) |
14 (31.1) |
4 (16.0) |
| Had condoms at time of orderb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes | 40 (57.1) |
20 (44.4) |
20 (80.0) |
|
|
No | 30 (42.9) |
25 (55.6) |
5 (20.0) |
|
|
|
n=50 | n=33 | n=17 |
| Use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) home testb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self | 34 (68.0) |
25 (75.8) |
9 (52.9) |
|
|
Significant other | 3 (6.0) |
3 (9.1) |
0 (0.0) |
|
|
Friend | 1 (2.0) |
1 (3.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
|
Acquaintance | 1 (2.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (5.9) |
|
|
Not yet used | 11 (22.0) |
4 (12.1) |
7 (41.2) |
| Prior intentions of at-home HIV test usersb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not planning to be tested | 34 (68.0) |
21 (63.6) |
13 (76.5) |
|
|
Replaced a planned test | 16 (32.0) |
12 (36.4) |
4 (23.5) |
aOrder history analyses include all pilot participants (n=121).
bReported in final evaluation survey (n=98).