Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 18;389(10074):1124–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32055-4

Table 2.

Differences between number of male individuals circumcised in each village pair

Intervention village
Control village
Percentage increase from control to intervention (95% CI)
Village name Total male population, n Number of male individuals circumcised Village name Total male population, n Number of males circumcised
1 Mwamashimba 4601 1777 (38·6%) Ngudu 13 471 1001 (7·4%) 31·2 (29·7 to 32·7)
2 Hungumalwa 7931 1733 (21·9%) Sumve 7984 2829 (35·4%) −13·5 (−14·9 to −12·1)
3 Nyamilama 3724 940 (25·2%) Nyambiti 6711 1869 (27·8%) −2·6 (−4·4 to −0·8)
4 Nzera 10 135 10 045 (99·1%) Nyarugusu 20 567 8350 (40·6%) 58·5 (57·8 to 59·2)
5 Misasi 7941 2794 (35·2%) Misungwi 14 864 2617 (17·6%) 17·6 (16·4 to 18·8)
6 Kharumwa 6546 4359 (66·6%) Nyang'wale 4600 1554 (33·8%) 32·8 (31·0 to 34·6)
7 Chato 8343 4148 (49·7%) Kachwamba 3532 1764 (49·9%) –0·2 (–2·2 to 1·8)
8 Masumbwe 9315 5093 (54·7%) Uyovu 14 763 5500 (37·3%) 17·4 (16·1 to 18·7)