Table 2.
Differences between number of male individuals circumcised in each village pair
Intervention village |
Control village |
Percentage increase from control to intervention (95% CI) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Village name | Total male population, n | Number of male individuals circumcised | Village name | Total male population, n | Number of males circumcised | ||
1 | Mwamashimba | 4601 | 1777 (38·6%) | Ngudu | 13 471 | 1001 (7·4%) | 31·2 (29·7 to 32·7) |
2 | Hungumalwa | 7931 | 1733 (21·9%) | Sumve | 7984 | 2829 (35·4%) | −13·5 (−14·9 to −12·1) |
3 | Nyamilama | 3724 | 940 (25·2%) | Nyambiti | 6711 | 1869 (27·8%) | −2·6 (−4·4 to −0·8) |
4 | Nzera | 10 135 | 10 045 (99·1%) | Nyarugusu | 20 567 | 8350 (40·6%) | 58·5 (57·8 to 59·2) |
5 | Misasi | 7941 | 2794 (35·2%) | Misungwi | 14 864 | 2617 (17·6%) | 17·6 (16·4 to 18·8) |
6 | Kharumwa | 6546 | 4359 (66·6%) | Nyang'wale | 4600 | 1554 (33·8%) | 32·8 (31·0 to 34·6) |
7 | Chato | 8343 | 4148 (49·7%) | Kachwamba | 3532 | 1764 (49·9%) | –0·2 (–2·2 to 1·8) |
8 | Masumbwe | 9315 | 5093 (54·7%) | Uyovu | 14 763 | 5500 (37·3%) | 17·4 (16·1 to 18·7) |