Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 18;389(10074):1124–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32055-4

Table 3.

Differences in male individuals who were circumcised in intervention and control villages, according to demographic characteristics and reasons for seeking circumcision

Intervention villages (n=30 889) Control villages (n=19 984*) p value
Age (years) 15 (12–18) 15 (12–19) 0·8
>25 years 2187 (7·1%) 1341 (6·8%) 0·44
Marital status
Married 7588 (24·6%) 6522 (32·6%) 0·001
Single 2705 (8·8%) 1721 (8·6%) 0·67
Minor living with parents 19 049 (61·7%) 11 688 (58·5%) 0·052
Religion
Muslim 828 (2·7%) 1060 (5·3%) 0·85
Christian 25 619 (82·9%) 16 196 (81·0%) 0·76
None 2974 (9·6%) 2700 (13·5%) 0·94
Reasons for seeking circumcision
To promote own health 360 (1·2%) 457 (2·3%) 0·56
Heard about it in church 9527 (30·8%) 132 (0·7%) <0·0001
Heard about it from a friend 5937 (19·2%) 2971 (14·9%) 0·49
Heard about it from a teacher 3792 (12·3%) 1345 (6·7%) 0·41
Heard about it from girlfriend or wife 556 (1·8%) 74 (0·4%) 0·002

Data are median (IQR) or number (%), unless otherwise stated.

*

Demographic data from one control village was lost.