Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;3(3):196–204. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00368

Table 2. Oxidation of Different Cyclohexane Derivatives.

graphic file with name oc-2016-00368n_0007.jpg

entry R conv (%)a yield (%)a K3(K4) K3/K4b Ee (K3) (%)
1 -t-Bu (S1) 77 53 (19) 1.4 44
2 -OPiv (S2) 80 41 (10) 2.0 54
3 -Si(Me)3 (S3) 95 42 (13) 1.6 23
4c -CO2CH3 (S4) 88 47 (20) 1.2 11
5 -CO2H (S5) 45 20 (11) 0.9 9e
6c -COCH3 (S6) 95 47 (19) 1.2 8
7 -NHCOCH3 (S7) 93 74 (3) 12 (+)63f
8c -NHCOCH3 (S7) 94 75 (3) 12 (−)78
9 -NHCOtBu (S8) >99 90 (1) 45 (+)76
10d -NHCOtBu (S8) >99 90 (1) 45 (−)76
11c -NHCOtBu (S8) >99 90 (1) 45 (−)85
a

Conversions and yields determined from crude reaction mixtures by GC or 1H NMR.

b

Normalized ratio.

c

(S,S)-Mn-(TIPSecp) (2 mol %).

d

(S,S)-Mn-(TIPSmcp).

e

Ee’s determined after esterification of isolated products.

f

Absolute configuration was determined on the basis of the crystal structure of the product obtained from S10 (see Table 4 and Supporting Information). Ee’s determined by GC with chiral stationary phase.