Table 2. L18 plan for statistical parameter design in performance optimization of the assessment method.
Run | Parameter | Results | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drug Conductivity [μS/cm] | Signal Frequency [kHz] | Electrodes Area [cm2] | Electrodes Gap [cm] | Signal Amplitude [V] | Sensitivity [ml−1] | Repeatabi-lity [%] | Nonlinea-rity [%] | Resolution [ml] | |
1 | 526 | 0.1 | 1.82 | 1.4 | 0.020 | 5.6 | 2.99 | 2.34 | 0.130 |
2 | 526 | 0.1 | 3.64 | 3.0 | 0.100 | 4.7 | 0.05 | 0.78 | 0.036 |
3 | 526 | 0.1 | 7.28 | 4.6 | 1.000 | 3.0 | 0.16 | 3.74 | 0.115 |
4 | 526 | 1.0 | 1.82 | 1.4 | 0.100 | 4.7 | 1.02 | 4.26 | 0.197 |
5 | 526 | 1.0 | 3.64 | 3.0 | 1.000 | 4.3 | 0.34 | 3.16 | 0.140 |
6 | 526 | 1.0 | 7.28 | 4.6 | 0.020 | 3.1 | 0.03 | 3.69 | 0.118 |
7 | 526 | 10.0 | 1.82 | 3.0 | 0.020 | 4.3 | 0.89 | 2.54 | 0.107 |
8 | 526 | 10.0 | 3.64 | 4.6 | 0.100 | 2.7 | 0.32 | 3.80 | 0.098 |
9 | 526 | 10.0 | 7.28 | 1.4 | 1.000 | 2.9 | 0.05 | 2.82 | 0.083 |
10 | 666 | 0.1 | 1.82 | 4.6 | 1.000 | 4.0 | 0.80 | 1.37 | 0.055 |
11 | 666 | 0.1 | 3.64 | 1.4 | 0.020 | 4.4 | 0.82 | 1.50 | 0.067 |
12 | 666 | 0.1 | 7.28 | 3.0 | 0.100 | 2.4 | 0.09 | 7.62 | 0.190 |
13 | 666 | 1.0 | 1.82 | 3.0 | 1.000 | 6.0 | 3.25 | 0.82 | 0.049 |
14 | 666 | 1.0 | 3.64 | 4.6 | 0.020 | 3.8 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.018 |
15 | 666 | 1.0 | 7.28 | 1.4 | 0.100 | 6.4 | 0.95 | 2.26 | 0.113 |
16 | 666 | 10.0 | 1.82 | 4.6 | 0.100 | 3.6 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.036 |
17 | 666 | 10.0 | 3.64 | 1.4 | 1.000 | 6.7 | 2.15 | 0.94 | 0.062 |
18 | 666 | 10.0 | 7.28 | 3.0 | 0.020 | 2.5 | 0.10 | 2.79 | 0.073 |
Overall mean | 4.2 | 0.84 | 2.55 | 0.09 |