Table 1.
Comparison of performances for Chlorella sp. AE10 and other strains reported in the references
| Microalgae strain | Light intensity (μmol m−2 s−1) | CO2 (%, v/v) | N or S condition | Maximum total carbohydrate content (% DW) | Carbohydrate productivity (g L−1 day−1) | Maximum starch content (% DW) | Starch productivity (g L−1 day−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenedesmus obliquus CNW-N | 240 | 2.5 | −N | 52.88 | 0.468a | – | – | [24] |
| Neochloris oleoabundans HK-129 | 200 | 4 | −N | 41.30 | 0.047 | – | – | [26] |
| Scenedesmus obliquus CNW-N | 140 | 2.5 | −N | 46.70 | 0.383 | – | – | [22] |
| Chlorella zofingiensis | 150 | 1 | −N | 66.9 | 0.407 | 43.4 | 0.268 | [12] |
| Tetraselmis subcordiformis | 200 | 3 | −S | – | – | 62.1 | 0.62 | [20] |
| Chlorella fusca | 1200 | 1.5 | −N | – | – | 49.0 | 0.38 | [25] |
| Chlorella sp. AE10 | 1000 | 10 | 0.375 g L−1 NaNO3 | 77.6 | 0.421b | 60.5 | 0.311b | This study |
| 0.927c | 0.730c |
aSemi-batch system
bThe carbohydrate or starch productivity is calculated with experimental data from day 0 to day 6
cThe carbohydrate or starch productivity is calculated with experimental data from day 3 to day 5