Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 24;14:38. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0491-1

Table 5.

Standardised regression coefficients (β) and standard errors in parenthesis (SE) of the total, direct and indirect effect of weight loss preoccupation in bullies, victims and bully-victims

Bullying role
Bully Victim Bully-victim
β (SE) p β (SE) p β (SE) p
Total effect (c) .218 (.113) <.001 .260 (.123) <.001 .292 (.102) <.001
Direct effect (c’) .183 (.110) .001 .141 (.153) .076 .179 (.115) .001
Indirect effect (ab) .035 (.040) .096 .120 (.106) .030 .114 (.069) .001

Note: Each bullying role was compared to the uninvolved group. All models controlled for sex, BMI percentile, pubertal stage, age, ethnicity, parent education, and included indirect paths between sex, pubertal stage and BMI percentile on weight loss preoccupation via psychological functioning and error covariance between body-esteem and weight loss preoccupation