Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 26;2(3):97–100. doi: 10.2176/nmccrj.2014-0450

Table 1.

Review of the 56 ruptured basilar artery dissections including our two cases

Baseline characteristics
General Mean age (years old) 48.2 (17–78)
Woman 34/56 (63%)
H&K grade  1 6 (11%)
 2 21 (38%)
 3 11 (20%)
 4 7 (13%)
 5 6 (11%)
 n.s. 5 (9%)
Radiological finding Dilatation 44 (79%)
Pearl-and-string 12 (21%)
*Stenotic lesions and complete occluded lesions are excluded in this review.
Treatment
Acute stage None 2 (5%)
Conservative therapy 21 (38%)
Surgical wrapping 4 (7%)
Endovascular flow reverse therapy 4 (7%)
Endovascular coiling 8 (14%)
RET with stents with or without coiling 17 (30%)
Chronic stage Surgical flow reverse therapy 4 (7%)
Surgical clipping 1 (2%)
Endovascular coiling 1 (2%)
RET with stents with or without coiling 1 (2%)
Results
Rebleeding Conservative treatment
 (dilated lesions) 3/13 (23%)
 (pearl-and-string lesions) 2/8 (25%)
 (total) 5/21 (24%)
Acute surgical or endovascular treatment 2/33 (6%)
GOS Good recovery 39 (70%)
Mild disability 3 (5%)
Severe disability 4 (7%)
Vegetative state 0 (0%)
Death 9 (16%)
n.s. 1 (2%)

GOS: Glasgow Outcome Scale, H&K: Hunt & Kosnik, n.s.: not specified, RET: reconstructive endovascular treatment, SAH: subarachnoid hemorrhage, VRD: vascular reconstruction device.