Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Apr;21(2):112–119. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000306

Table 2.

Overall percent agreement for both devices compared to pathology as well as the POCkeT compared to a standard-of-care colposcope for original 44 image pairs. Overall statistics were calculated by compiling all physician responses (352 total image pairs). Pathological breakdown of the additional image pairs was 21 normal (48%), 10 LSIL (23%), and 13 HSIL (30%).

Protocol 1
Percent Agreement (%)
Normal LSIL HSIL Total
Standard-of-care Colposcope vs Pathology 71 24 51 54
POCkeT Colposcope vs Pathology 73 18 37 50
POCkeT Colposcope vs Standard-of-care Colposcope 89 33 51 69