Table 3.

Percent agreement for both devices compared to pathology as well as the POCkeT compared to a standard-of-care colposcope for the second protocol of image pairs, which were procedurally corrected for lack of visualization of lesion margin and vascularization. Only the highest performing physician completed these additional blinded and randomized evaluations for a total of 18 image pairs. Pathological breakdown of the additional image pairs was 4 normal (22%), 3 LSIL (17%), and 11 HSIL (61%). The two procedural adjustments in these additional 18 image pairs greatly improved the ability of the POCkeT colposcope to correctly identify pathological HSILs.

	Protocol 2
	Percent Agreement (%)
	Normal	LSIL	HSIL	Total
Standard-of-care Colposcope vs Pathology	50	67	55	56
POCkeT Colposcope vs Pathology	50	33	55	50
POCkeT Colposcope vs Standard-of-care Colposcope	80	33	86	67