Table 2.
The results of logistic regression (estimator value and its significance)∗.
Estimate | Std. error | z value | Pr(>|z|) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hair model | ||||
(Intercept) | 6.5 | 2.58 | 2.52 | 0.0119 |
Zn.H | −0.088 | 0.0274 | −3.21 | 0.00131 |
Cu.H | 0.204 | 0.0884 | 2.3 | 0.0213 |
Mn.H | 1.71 | 0.692 | 2.47 | 0.0135 |
Co.H | −19.7 | 8.71 | −2.26 | 0.0235 |
| ||||
Nail model | ||||
(Intercept) | −6.65 | 3.52 | −1.89 | 0.0591 |
Fe.N | 0.112 | 0.0368 | 3.03 | 0.00247 |
Zn.N | −0.101 | 0.0338 | −3 | 0.00274 |
Cu.N | 0.38 | 0.141 | 2.69 | 0.00719 |
| ||||
Total model | ||||
(Intercept) | −3.5 | 4.43 | −0.791 | 0.429 |
Zn.H | −0.122 | 0.0408 | −2.98 | 0.00286 |
Fe.N | 0.0909 | 0.0293 | 3.1 | 0.00193 |
Cu.H | 0.361 | 0.124 | 2.9 | 0.00373 |
Pb.N | 2.7 | 1.08 | 2.51 | 0.012 |
∗The modelled equation computes depression probability from the most significant elements determined in hair and nails.