Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 12;2017:5952897. doi: 10.1155/2017/5952897

Table 6.

Chemical evaluation of CAT, SOD, and MDA activities.

Treatments CAT (mmol H2O2/mg protein) SOD (units/mg protein) TBARS (mmol/mg protein)
H2O + Scop 58.6 ± 4.6c 0.8 ± 0.2c 1.3 ± 0.2b
39.3 + Scop 115.8 ± 1.1 2.4 ± 0.12 0.8 ± 0.1
98.25 + Scop 251.4 ± 32.6∗∗∗ 5.1 ± 0.5∗∗ 0.6 ± 0.1∗∗
196.5 + Scop 274.4 ± 8.8∗∗∗ 4.9 ± 0.2∗∗ 0.6 ± 0.1∗∗
393 + Scop 325.0 ± 18.9∗∗∗ 6.4 ± 0.4∗∗∗ 0.6 ± 0.1∗∗
Pira + Scop 179.2 ± 9.0∗∗ 4.7 ± 0.3∗∗ 0.7 ± 0.1∗∗
H2O + H2O 244.5 ± 10.9∗∗∗ 6.7 ± 0.2∗∗∗ 0.6 ± 0.1∗∗

Data are mean ± SEM, n = 5 per dose. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 as compared with scopolamine-treated group (H2O + Scop), one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's test; bP < 0.01, cP < 0.001 compared to the normal control group (H2O + H2O), one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's test. Pira: piracetam, H2O: distilled water, CAT: catalase, SOD: superoxide dismutase, TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substance activity.