Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;3:16. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0132-0

Table 8.

Data completeness

Scoring Follow-up time point Control (N = 4) n (col %) Intervention (N = 8) n (col %) Overall (N = 12) n (col %)
NSAA score Consent 4 (100) 8 (100) 12 (100)
Baseline 4 (100) 8 (100) 12 (100)
6 months 2 (100) 8 (100) 10 (100)
FVC absolute Consent 4 (100) 7 (88) 11 (92)
Baseline 2 (50) 5 (63) 7 (58)
6 months 0 (0) 5 (63) 5 (56)
FVC % predicted for height Consent 2 (50) 4 (50) 6 (50)
Baseline 2 (50) 5 (63) 7 (58)
6 months 0 (0) 5 (63) 5 (56)
6-min total distance Consent 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Baseline 4 (100) 8 (100) 12 (100)
6 months 1 (100) 8 (100) 9 (100)
CHU utility value Consent 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Baseline 3 (75) 8 (100) 11 (92)
6 months 1 (100) 8 (100) 9 (100)
CarerQOL score Consent 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Baseline 3 (75) 7 (88) 10 (83)
6 months 1 (100) 7 (88) 8 (89)
CarerQOL happy VAS Consent 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Baseline 3 (75) 8 (100) 11 (92)
6 months 1 (100) 8 (100) 9 (100)
ACTIVLIM patient score Consent 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Baseline 3 (75) 8 (100) 11 (92)
6 months 1 (100) 8 (100) 9 (100)
ACTIVLIM patient measure Consent 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Baseline 3 (75) 8 (100) 11 (92)
6 months 1 (100) 8 (100) 9 (100)