Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Sep 2;40(10):2085–2093. doi: 10.1111/acer.13197

Table 1.

Demographic, Drinking History Assessment, and Liver Injury Markers in Alcohol-Dependent Patients.

Measures Group 1 (Normal ALT, GR.1)
Group 2 (Elevated ALT, GR.2)
p-Value (GR.1 and GR. 2)
Males (34; 58.6%) Females (24; 41.4%) Within-gr.sex diff. p-value Total (58; 50.4%) Males (40; 70.2%) Females (16; 29.8%) Within-gr. sex diff. p-value Total (56; 49.6%)
Age (years) 37.6 ± 10.5 42.3 ± 10.6 NS 39.6 ± 10.7 43.0 ± 10.3 43.1 ± 10.3 NS 43.0 ± 10.2 0.080
BMI (kg/m2) 27.7 ± 4.2   25.7 ± 7.3   NS 26.9 ± 5.7   25.7 ± 3.8   26.3 ± 5.0   NS 25.9 ± 4.1   NS
Drinking history
 TD90 957.2 ± 622.5 925.7 ± 735.1 NS 946.1 ± 656.9 1186.7 ± 528.5   950.3 ± 411.3 NS 1119.8 ± 505.9   NS
 HDD90 62.1 ± 26.9 62.7 ± 20.8 NS 62.3 ± 24.7 73.5 ± 20.7 76.8 ± 14.6 NS 74.5 ± 19.1 0.007
 AvgDD90 13.9 ± 7.9   13.0 ± 7.7   NS 13.6 ± 7.7   15.6 ± 5.9   12.1 ± 5.1   NS 14.6 ± 5.8   NS
 NDD90 67.4 ± 24.9 67.4 ± 21.0 NS 67.4 ± 23.4 76.7 ± 17.9 78.2 ± 13.6 NS 77.1 ± 16.7 0.017
 NNDD90 22.4 ± 24.9 22.5 ± 21.1 NS 22.4 ± 23.4 13.2 ± 17.9 11.8 ± 13.6 NS 12.8 ± 16.7 0.019
Liver injury markers
 ALT (IU/l) 28.9 ± 6.9   22.0 ± 8.3   0.001 26.0 ± 8.2   86.4 ± 35.3 111.9 ± 77.7   NS 93.6 ± 51.6 NA
 AST (IU/l) 27.4 ± 16.2 28.8 ± 15.1 NS 28.0 ± 15.7 113.8 ± 79.5   181.4 ± 116.8 0.016 133.1 ± 95.7   ≤0.001

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; TD90, total drinks past 90 days; HDD90, heavy drinking days past 90 days; AvgDD90, average drinks per drinking day past 90 days; NDD90, number of drinking days in past 90 days; NNDD90, number of nondrinking days in past 90 days; NS, not significant; NA, not applicable.

Age was significantly different only in males between GR.1 and GR.2 groups (p = 0.030). Males also showed significant differences in the BMI values between the GR.1 and GR.2 (p = 0.044). Markers of drinking history: HDD90, NNDD90, and NDD90 showed significant difference between the study arms. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05; trend level of significance (noted in italics) at 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.1 (for presentation only).