Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;10(2):103–126. doi: 10.1177/1756285616675777

Table 1.

Efficacy data from phase II and phase III studies [Ben-Menachem et al. 2007; Halasz et al. 2009; Chung et al. 2010b] ITT population, ranges (min–max).

Reference Study no. Phase Design Study population, years Study duration, weeks Median seizure reduction, % 50% responder rate, % Seizure freedom, %
Ben-Menachem et al. [2007] SP667 IIb r, db, pc 418 (18–65) 28 (8 b + 6 ti + 12 m + 2 tr) placebo: 10 placebo: 21.9 placebo: 0
200 mg: 26 (p = 0.1010) 200 mg: 32.7 (p = 0.0899) 200 mg: 0.9
400 mg: 39 (p = 0.0023) 400 mg: 41.1 (p = 0.0038) 400 mg: 4.6
600 mg: 40 (p = 0.0084) 600 mg: 38.1 (p = 0.0141) 600 mg: 0.9
Chung et al. [2010b] SP754 III r, db, pc 405 (16–70) 28 (8 b + 6 ti + 12 m + 2 tr) placebo: 20.8 placebo: 18.3 placebo: 0
400 mg: 37.3 (p = 0.008) 400 mg: 38.3 (p < 0.001) 400 mg: 2.5
600 mg: 37.8 (p = 0.006) 600 mg: 41.2 (p < 0.001) 600 mg: 8.1
Halasz et al. [2009] SP755 III r, db, pc 485 (16–70) 26 (8 b + 4 t + 12 m + 2 ti) placebo: 20.5 placebo: 25.8 placebo: 2.1
200 mg: 35.3 (p = 0.02) 200 mg: 35.0 (p = 0.07) 200 mg: 3.6
400 mg: 36.4 (p = 0.03) 400 mg: 40.5 (p = 0.01) 400 mg: 2.4

Statistically significant results are shown in bold.

b, baseline period; db, double blind; ITT, intention-to-treat; m, maintenance period; pc, placebo-controlled; r, randomized; ti, titration period; tr, transition period.