Table 2. Degradation efficiencies of bacterial consortia and single strains.
order | groups | inoculum volume(ml) | degradation efficiency(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1# | 2# | 3# | 4# | 5# | |||
1 | individual strain | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.5±2.1% |
2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65.4±1.3% | |
3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 60.2±0.5% | |
4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 55.5±1.5% | |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 51.4±0.8% | |
6 | two strains | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53.3±3.0% |
7 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 48.7±2.3% | |
8 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 67.2±4.1% | |
9 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 58.5±1.4% | |
10 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 70.4±1.1% | |
11 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 56.6±2.3% | |
12 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 51.4±1.6% | |
13 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 71.8±2.2% | |
14 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 60.5±1.5% | |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 67.2±0.6% | |
16 | three strains | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0 | 0 | 62.6±1.9% |
17 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0 | 1.67 | 0 | 70.8±1.3% | |
18 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0 | 0 | 1.67 | 41.6±0.9% | |
19 | 0 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0 | 70.1±2.6% | |
20 | 0 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0 | 1.67 | 44.2±3.2% | |
21 | 0 | 0 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 41.9±1.7% | |
22 | 0 | 1.67 | 0 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 54.2±3.5% | |
23 | 1.67 | 0 | 0 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 72.2±2.7% | |
24 | 1.67 | 0 | 1.67 | 0 | 1.67 | 55.4±1.5% | |
25 | 1.67 | 0 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0 | 58.4±2.6% | |
26 | four strains | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0 | 71.9±3.4% |
27 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0 | 1.25 | 64.2±4.7% | |
28 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 71.9±1.4% | |
29 | 1.25 | 0 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 69.7±2.3% | |
30 | 0 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 57.4±1.2% | |
31 | five strains | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 75.1±1.9% |