Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;12(3):e0173923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173923

Table 2. Bacterial diversity indices of different rotational treatments.

Treatments Reads 0.97
OTU Ace Chao Shannon Simpson
BFC1 55129 3415 3773 3801 6.95 0.0029
BFC2 3500 3854 3860 7.00 0.0029
BFC3 3463 3753 3740 7.09 0.0021
BFCAve1 10378 3793 a2 3800 a 7.01 a 0.0026 a
0.0039
BFN1 3350 3773 3744 6.78
BFN2 3024 3629 3607 5.87 0.015
BFN3 3310 3738 3758 6.76 0.0036
BFNAve 9684 3713b 3703 a 6.47 b 0.0076 a
CF1 3307 3684 3724 6.98 0.0024
CF2 3230 3682 3767 6.86 0.0033
CF3 3235 3581 3634 6.96 0.0027
CFAve 9772 3649 b 3708 a 6.93 ab 0.0028 a
CN1 3333 3710 3751 7.04 0.0020
CN2 3363 3699 3720 7.03 0.0022
CN3 3442 3771 3814 7.09 0.0019
CNAve 10138 3727 ab 3762 a 7.05 a 0.0020 a

1 Mean values (Ave) are subsampling of three replications of one treatment.

2Data followed by the same letter is not significantly different between treatments (P ≤0.05, SPSS).

OUT: Operational Taxonomic Units; Ace: community richness; Chao: community richness; Shannon: community diversity; Simpson: community diversity.