Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb 9;43(4):700–718. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000342

Table 2.

Planned comparisons for accuracy and reaction time for each length and letter position in Experiment 1.

Word length and position of mismatch Accuracy Reaction Time
z-value Odds Ratio t-value Mean Difference Percent Change
Three-letter words

1 vs. 2 1.79 1.44 −5.52*** −98.75 12%
1 vs. 3 0.78 1.17 −4.78*** −85.27 10%
2 vs. 3 −1.02 0.81 0.75 13.48 2%

Four-letter words

1 vs. 2 2.59* 1.68 −5.13*** −83.25 10%
1 vs. 3 3.30** 1.93 −5.57*** −90.83 11%
1 vs. 4 3.34** 1.94 −5.58*** −91.03 11%
2 vs. 3 0.73 1.15 −0.46 −7.59 1%
2 vs. 4 0.77 1.15 −0.47 −7.78 1%
3 vs. 4 0.04 1.01 −0.01 −0.20 0%

Five-letter words

1 vs. 2 1.53 1.40 −4.74*** −82.53 10%
1 vs. 3 2.05 1.57 −4.55*** −79.45 9%
1 vs. 4 2.02 1.56 −4.77*** −83.51 10%
1 vs. 5 3.70** 2.21 −3.59** −63.61 7%
2 vs. 3 0.52 1.12 0.18 3.08 0%
2 vs. 4 0.49 1.11 −0.06 −0.99 0%
2 vs. 5 2.20 1.58 1.06 18.91 2%
3 vs. 4 −0.03 0.99 −0.23 −4.07 0%
3 vs. 5 1.68 1.41 0.89 15.83 2%
4 vs. 5 1.71 1.42 1.11 19.90 2%

Six-letter words

1 vs. 2 3.21* 2.06 −6.50*** −96.93 11%
1 vs. 3 3.99*** 2.43 −8.15*** −122.56 14%
1 vs. 4 4.24*** 2.55 −9.40*** −141.77 16%
1 vs. 5 3.26* 2.08 −8.79*** −131.37 15%
1 vs. 6 4.34*** 2.61 −7.21*** −108.47 12%
2 vs. 3 0.82 1.18 −1.69 −25.62 3%
2 vs. 4 1.07 1.24 −2.94* −44.84 5%
2 vs. 5 0.05 1.01 −2.28 −34.44 4%
2 vs. 6 1.18 1.27 −0.76 −11.53 1%
3 vs. 4 0.25 1.05 −1.25 −19.21 2%
3 vs. 5 −0.77 0.86 −0.58 −8.81 1%
3 vs.6 0.36 1.07 0.92 14.09 2%
4 vs. 5 −1.02 0.81 0.68 10.40 1%
4 vs. 6 0.11 1.02 2.17 33.30 4%
5 vs. 6 1.14 1.26 1.50 22.90 3%
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001