Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb 9;43(4):700–718. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000342

Table 3.

Planned comparisons for accuracy and reaction time for each word length and letter position in Experiment 2.

Word length and position of mismatch Accuracy Reaction Time
z-value Odds Ratio t-value Mean Difference Percent Change
Three-letter words

1 vs. 2 0.87 1.27 −1.58 −24.12 3%
1 vs. 3 0.38 1.11 −2.02 −30.83 4%
2 vs. 3 −0.49 0.88 −0.44 −6.71 1%

Four-letter words

1 vs. 2 −1.03 0.78 −2.30 −42.82 5%
1 vs. 3 −1.14 0.76 −1.66 −30.71 3%
1 vs. 4 −1.22 0.75 −0.44 −8.20 1%
2 vs. 3 −0.11 0.97 0.66 12.11 1%
2 vs. 4 −0.19 0.96 1.88 34.62 4%
3 vs. 4 −0.08 0.98 1.22 22.52 2%

Five-letter words

1 vs. 2 1.04 1.29 0.24 4.14 0%
1 vs. 3 1.15 1.33 1.12 19.42 2%
1 vs. 4 2.10 1.68 0.68 11.93 1%
1 vs. 5 1.31 1.38 0.12 2.08 0%
2 vs. 3 0.12 1.03 0.88 15.28 2%
2 vs. 4 1.08 1.30 0.44 7.78 1%
2 vs. 5 0.28 1.07 −0.12 −2.06 0%
3 vs. 4 0.96 1.26 −0.43 −7.49 1%
3 vs. 5 0.16 1.04 −0.99 −17.34 2%
4 vs. 5 −0.80 0.83 −0.56 −9.84 1%

Six-letter words

1 vs. 2 2.21 1.69 −3.12* −61.88 6%
1 vs. 3 0.02 1.00 −1.89 −36.99 4%
1 vs. 4 1.44 1.42 −3.64** −72.03 7%
1 vs. 5 2.78 1.93 −3.86** −75.88 8%
1 vs. 6 0.91 1.25 −3.60** −71.21 7%
2 vs. 3 −2.19 0.59 1.25 24.89 2%
2 vs. 4 −0.77 0.84 −0.51 −10.16 1%
2 vs. 5 0.58 1.14 −0.70 −14.00 1%
2 vs. 6 −1.31 0.74 −0.47 −9.34 1%
3 vs. 4 1.42 1.41 −1.77 −35.04 3%
3 vs. 5 2.76 1.92 −1.96 −38.89 4%
3 vs.6 0.89 1.24 −1.73 −34.22 3%
4 vs. 5 1.35 1.36 −0.19 −3.85 0%
4 vs. 6 −0.54 0.88 0.04 0.82 0%
5 vs. 6 −1.89 0.65 0.23 4.67 0%
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001