Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb 9;43(4):700–718. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000342

Table 4.

Planned comparisons for accuracy and reaction time for each word length and letter position in Experiment 3.

Word length and position of mismatch Accuracy Reaction Time
z-value Odds Ratio t-value Mean Difference Percent Change
Three-letter words

1 vs. 2 4.18*** 2.39 −4.72*** −95.93 11%
1 vs. 3 5.28*** 2.98 −5.52*** −113.24 13%
2 vs. 3 1.17 1.25 −0.83 −17.31 2%

Four-letter words

1 vs. 2 2.39 1.51 −3.70** −82.69 8%
1 vs. 3 3.96*** 1.95 −4.46*** −101.47 10%
1 vs. 4 5.35*** 2.45 −5.15*** −118.50 12%
2 vs. 3 1.60 1.30 −0.82 −18.77 2%
2 vs. 4 3.03* 1.62 −1.54 −35.81 4%
3 vs. 4 1.44 1.25 −0.72 −17.04 2%

Five-letter words

1 vs. 2 0.41 1.07 −4.88*** −111.11 11%
1 vs. 3 3.81** 1.76 −4.57*** −106.58 10%
1 vs. 4 5.04*** 2.10 −7.32*** −172.78 17%
1 vs. 5 6.05*** 2.42 −7.88*** −188.31 18%
2 vs. 3 3.41** 1.65 0.19 4.53 0%
2 vs. 4 4.65*** 1.97 −2.60 −61.67 6%
2 vs. 5 5.67*** 2.27 −3.21* −77.19 7%
3 vs. 4 1.27 1.19 −2.74 −66.20 6%
3 vs. 5 2.32 1.37 −3.34** −81.73 8%
4 vs. 5 1.06 1.15 −0.63 −15.53 2%

Six-letter words

1 vs. 2 3.43** 1.77 −7.27*** −161.41 15%
1 vs. 3 3.63** 1.82 −7.01*** −155.43 14%
1 vs. 4 5.94*** 2.62 −9.36*** −213.41 19%
1 vs. 5 7.48*** 3.33 −9.77*** −231.38 21%
1 vs. 6 7.43*** 3.30 −10.68*** −251.86 23%
2 vs. 3 0.20 1.03 0.26 5.98 1%
2 vs. 4 2.60 1.48 −2.22 −51.99 5%
2 vs. 5 4.23*** 1.88 −2.88* −69.97 6%
2 vs. 6 4.18*** 1.87 −3.73** −90.45 8%
3 vs. 4 2.40 1.44 −2.48 −57.97 5%
3 vs. 5 4.03*** 1.82 −3.13* −75.95 7%
3 vs.6 3.98** 1.81 −3.99** −96.43 9%
4 vs. 5 1.66 1.27 −0.72 −17.98 2%
4 vs. 6 1.60 1.26 −1.56 −38.46 4%
5 vs. 6 −0.06 0.99 −0.80 −20.48 2%
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001