Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb 9;43(4):700–718. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000342

Table 5.

Planned comparisons for accuracy and reaction time for each word length and letter position in Experiment 4.

Word length and position of mismatch Accuracy Reaction Time
z-value Odds Ratio t-value Mean Difference Percent Change
Three-letter words

1 vs. 2 3.27** 1.62 −3.79*** −79.81 8%
1 vs. 3 5.01*** 2.07 −5.35*** −114.94 12%
2 vs. 3 1.79 1.28 −1.60 −35.13 4%

Four-letter words

1 vs. 2 2.64* 1.52 −4.81*** −98.61 10%
1 vs. 3 3.40** 1.71 −4.74*** −97.77 10%
1 vs. 4 4.38*** 1.98 −5.43*** −113.29 11%
2 vs. 3 0.77 1.12 0.04 0.84 0%
2 vs. 4 1.77 1.31 −0.69 −14.68 1%
3 vs. 4 1.00 1.16 −0.73 −15.52 2%

Five-letter words

1 vs. 2 3.00* 1.52 −6.61*** −145.25 14%
1 vs. 3 4.17*** 1.78 −5.60*** −124.27 12%
1 vs. 4 3.65** 1.66 −7.33*** −162.53 15%
1 vs. 5 4.88*** 1.96 −6.65*** −148.34 14%
2 vs. 3 1.17 1.17 0.93 20.97 2%
2 vs. 4 0.65 1.09 −0.77 −17.28 2%
2 vs. 5 1.91 1.29 −0.14 −3.10 0%
3 vs. 4 −0.53 0.93 −1.68 −38.25 4%
3 vs. 5 0.74 1.10 −1.05 −24.07 2%
4 vs. 5 1.27 1.18 0.62 14.18 1%

Six-letter words

1 vs. 2 4.52*** 2.01 −6.11*** −141.23 13%
1 vs. 3 2.64 1.51 −6.73*** −153.99 14%
1 vs. 4 5.39*** 2.29 −7.51*** −175.65 16%
1 vs. 5 6.65*** 2.76 −9.35*** −223.65 20%
1 vs. 6 4.84*** 2.11 −7.49*** −174.88 16%
2 vs. 3 −1.93 0.75 −0.54 −12.76 1%
2 vs. 4 0.90 1.14 −1.42 −34.41 3%
2 vs. 5 2.22 1.37 −3.34* −82.42 8%
2 vs. 6 0.33 1.05 −1.39 −33.65 3%
3 vs. 4 2.83 1.51 −0.91 −21.65 2%
3 vs. 5 4.13*** 1.82 −2.85 −69.66 6%
3 vs.6 2.26 1.39 −0.88 −20.89 2%
4 vs. 5 1.31 1.20 −1.93 −48.01 4%
4 vs. 6 −0.58 0.92 0.03 0.77 0%
5 vs. 6 −1.89 0.77 1.96 48.77 4%
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001