Table 2.

TaSnRK2.3-1A haplotypes associated with agronomic traits in 10 environments.

Environments	PH		PLE		LPN		TGW
	P-value	PVE (%)	P-value	PVE (%)	P-value	PVE (%)	P-value	PVE (%)
2010-CP-WW	2.58E-06∗∗∗	13.56	9.11E-06∗∗∗	12.17	3.33E-05∗∗∗	10.75	n.s.	–
2010-CP-DS	8.77E-07∗∗∗	14.76	1.31E-06∗∗∗	14.31	0.0048∗∗	5.46	0.0343∗	3.42
2010-SY-WW	1.29E-05∗∗∗	11.83	1.17E-05∗∗∗	11.93	1.40E-04∗∗∗	9.22	0.0177∗	4.10
2010-SY-DS	1.01E-06∗∗∗	14.59	2.86E-05∗∗∗	10.91	9.85E-07∗∗∗	14.62	0.0302∗	3.55
2011-SY-WW	4.08E-07∗∗∗	15.62	8.92E-06∗∗∗	12.19	8.74E-06∗∗∗	12.21	0.029∗	3.59
2011-SY-DS	8.66E-07∗∗∗	14.78	2.93E-04∗∗∗	8.41	8.37E-05∗∗∗	9.75	0.005∗∗	5.41
2012-CP-WW	7.55E-06∗∗∗	12.39	0.0037∗∗	5.74	0.0017∗∗	6.52	n.s.	–
2012-CP-DS	7.13E-06∗∗∗	12.46	0.0159∗	4.21	0.0017∗∗	6.53	n.s.	–
2012-SY-WW	7.71E-07∗∗∗	14.94	1.93E-05∗∗∗	11.36	5.34E-04∗∗∗	7.77	n.s.	–
2012-SY-DS	2.80E-06∗∗∗	13.48	0.0278∗	3.64	0.0011∗∗	7.00	0.0134∗	4.39

PH, plant height; PLE, peduncle length; LPN, length of penultimate node; TGW, 1,000-grain weight; n.s., not significant; ^∗P < 0.05, ^∗∗P < 0.01, and ^∗∗∗P < 0.001; PVE, phenotypic variation explained. The environments were at Changping (CP) and Shunyi (SY) under well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS) conditions in 2010–2012.