Table 2. Pairwise comparison analysis (P values) of neurotrophic effect of SF and CSK conditioned media.
Basal media | SFCM |
CSKCM |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30% | 60% | 90% | 30% | 60% | 90% | |||
Basal media | 0.012 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.131 | 0.284 | 0.510 | ||
SF CM | 30% | 0.012 | 0.033 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.008 | |
60% | <0.001 | 0.033 | 0.262 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
90% | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.262 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
CSK CM | 30% | 0.131 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.754 | 0.014 | |
60% | 0.284 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.754 | 0.238 | ||
90% | 0.510 | 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.114 | 0.238 |
P values of pairwise comparisons of estimated margin means for DRG treatment with CSK, SF conditioned media and basal media. P < 0.05 was statistically significance.