Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;14(3):303. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030303

Table 1.

Sample site description and in-situ water quality characteristics. Water quality parameters were analyzed in triplicate (n = 3) and the relative standard deviation as a percentage (%RSD) are presented in the parentheses.

BR Site EHMP Site GPS Coordinates Temp. (°C) Conductivity (mS·cm−1) Salinity (ppt) pH Turbidity (NTU) DOC * (mg·L−1) Site Characteristics Suspected Source of Pollution
BR1 714 27°23′58” S;
152°36′26′′ E
21.7
(0.4)
0.39
(<0.1)
0.19
(<0.1)
7.14
(<0.1)
0.5
(1.7)
9.32
(0.8)
Rural Wildlife, waterfowl, recreational activities.
BR2 711 27°29′51′′ S;
152°42′7′′ E
28.1
(<0.1)
0.53
(<0.1)
0.25
(<0.1)
8.00
(<0.1)
5.2
(0.1)
9.30
(0.4)
Rural Cattle, horses, septic tanks, wildlife.
BR3 718 27°33′8′′ S;
152°59′31′′ E
26.6
(<0.1)
0.7
(<0.1)
0.32
(<0.1)
7.00
(<0.1)
137
(0.2)
8.88
(0.5)
Peri urban, tidally influenced Wastewater treatment plants, waterfowls.
BR4 703 27°26′38′′ S;
153°3′3′′ E
25.7
(<0.1)
46.5
(<0.1)
30.17
(<0.1)
7.77
(<0.1)
15.3
(4.4)
4.35
(0.5)
Urban Recreational activities, tidal influence.
BR5 702 27°26′56′′ S;
153°5′0′′ E
25.4
(<0.1)
46.9
(<0.13)
30.47
(0.3)
7.71
(<0.1)
11.6
(0.1)
5.02
(1.2)
Urban Port, industrial activities, tidal influence.

Note: EHMP is defined as “Ecosystem Health Monitoring Program”. * DOC is defined as dissolved organic carbon.